GNRi1959 Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Is it normal practice to try using large radius points in a layout. Although I am trying to keep all curving to large radius I find that I may have to resort to small radius pointwork to achieve what I want to do. Any thoughts? Quote
0 BosKonay Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Generally medium points are acceptable for space saving and the larger the radius you can fit for running the better! have you a draft track plan? Quote
0 GNRi1959 Posted January 20, 2018 Author Posted January 20, 2018 The small radius Y points work better to form a double track cross-over and are clearly seen in the original Omagh track plan. I also need to use a small radius Y point where the Portadown line swings off a curve and sweeps out the the station heading east. The track plan is a series of sketches, over multiple attempts and only starting to come clear now. Quote
0 David Holman Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Depends what you mean by small. In 4mm scale 900mm radius is desirable, especially from a visual point of view and you could get away with 750mm by judicious use of transition curves and scenery. Set track points meanwhile go down to below 450mm and while some locos and stock will still go round them, to my eyes they certainly ain't pretty! Ok if hidden in a tunnel, I guess. Another factor is the length of individual items of stock. The shorter they are, the tighter the curves you can get away with. 20m coaches and 500mm curves to be avoided if you can. Quote
0 GNRi1959 Posted January 20, 2018 Author Posted January 20, 2018 David, the curves on the layout are generally anything from 760mm - 1100mm and they work well. It is impossible to incorporate a cross-over in a curve of over 1metre radius as nothing exists. Small radius Y points used together come close to providing an authentic crossover, similar to those in Omagh. As shown below......... Quote
0 David Holman Posted January 20, 2018 Posted January 20, 2018 Looks good to me. On Arigna I have a Marcway 6' Y point. Unlike Peco, the curve starts at the toe, so from there to the clearance point is just 12" - in 7mm scale too, less than two thirds the length of a standard turnout. 1 Quote
0 David Holman Posted January 23, 2018 Posted January 23, 2018 Checkout current Railway Modeller. Somebody has done a 6x4 oval layout, copy Rev Awdry's Ffarquhar from 60 plus years ago. Set track points and curves down to 450mm, it looks really good. Small locos and four wheeled stock - just goes to show what can be done. So, pass me the sauce, I have a hat to eat. Quote
0 GNRi1959 Posted January 23, 2018 Author Posted January 23, 2018 When setting out the track work on my baseboards last night in pencil using a trammel, the radius on the double track main line was 500mm radius and over. I thought they weren't too bad. Quote
Question
GNRi1959
Is it normal practice to try using large radius points in a layout. Although I am trying to keep all curving to large radius I find that I may have to resort to small radius pointwork to achieve what I want to do. Any thoughts?
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.