Warbonnet Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago Recently, we received the first sample of our highly anticipated Electrostar project — a model we’re developing in conjunction with our friends at Rails of Sheffield. This early, unpowered sample has been sent for us to inspect the fidelity of the moulds and to begin our feedback process, allowing us to accelerate the model into the decoration stages. Well, we were certainly taken aback when we saw it. We know self-praise is no praise, but wow — it’s a bit of a stunner! As with any early sample, there are a few areas that will need some fettling before moving forward. The kinematic couplings, for example, will require a little refinement. Our development team will also be revisiting the roof access and fixings, as they’re not entirely satisfied with the magnetic fittings and roof removal — particularly on the PTSOL. These areas will be adjusted to ensure a more secure and reliable fit. Another element under review is the mechanism that enables the fitting of destination screens. The concept works, but it needs further evaluation to see how it impacts other areas of the design before it’s finalised. On a more positive note, the underframes are looking excellent, with plenty of fine detail and an accurate shape — especially around the cab. The overall weight, centre of gravity, and balance are spot on, and the integration of the mechanics — including the motor and pantograph — has turned out very nicely indeed. We expect a fully powered version to arrive shortly, allowing us to begin performance evaluation and electronics testing. This next phase will bring a whole new level of interactivity and fidelity not yet seen on any UK-outline multiple unit to date. If everything goes according to plan, we hope to show you decorated samples around Easter 2026, and at this stage, our delivery date remains unchanged. All in all, it’s a very encouraging first step for the Electrostar — a few tweaks still to make, but plenty to be happy with as the project moves closer to production. Look out for videos taking a closer look and offering more in-depth insights from both Rails of Sheffield and ourselves next week! Fancy one? Place your pre-order (with your reservation fee) through Rails or directly via the link below. Pre-Order Your Electrostar Direct Here! View the full article 1
Mol_PMB Posted 14 hours ago Posted 14 hours ago You might want to take another look at the bodyside near the intermediate ends, where you have a bold raised bead line running vertically. The end module (last 800mm or so of each end of the carbody) was bolted on with 6 big bolts (2 M36 and 4 M30 if I remember correctly from my time in U shop). This left a gap between the end and the bodyside, which was filled with black Sikaflex sealant from a big air-powered sealant gun. The gap was filled flush, not to a raised profile. Also, the end module included the part below floor level. So that joint continued down across the solebar. This photo on Flickr (not mine) shows what the end joint should look like: Not like this: More recent builds may have a slightly different treatment in this area, but it's still not a raised bead line, and again the joint continues below the solebar. Again, a photo on Flickr, not mine. The raised bead between the doors also looks wrong to me. The doors were designed to seat very flush, there isn't a raised portion where they join: Cheers Mol 1 1
BosKonay Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 8 hours ago, Mol_PMB said: You might want to take another look at the bodyside near the intermediate ends, where you have a bold raised bead line running vertically. The end module (last 800mm or so of each end of the carbody) was bolted on with 6 big bolts (2 M36 and 4 M30 if I remember correctly from my time in U shop). This left a gap between the end and the bodyside, which was filled with black Sikaflex sealant from a big air-powered sealant gun. The gap was filled flush, not to a raised profile. Also, the end module included the part below floor level. So that joint continued down across the solebar. This photo on Flickr (not mine) shows what the end joint should look like: Not like this: More recent builds may have a slightly different treatment in this area, but it's still not a raised bead line, and again the joint continues below the solebar. Again, a photo on Flickr, not mine. The raised bead between the doors also looks wrong to me. The doors were designed to seat very flush, there isn't a raised portion where they join: Cheers Mol The sample is a 375/6, so a South Eastern example, which do exhibit the mastic sealer joins.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now