-
Posts
169 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Resource Library
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Community Map
Everything posted by PaulC
-
I had built the bridge below for my previous layout and wanted to incorporate it in to the new one so the height levels were based on this. I don't recall exactly what that height was but I think it was something in or around 70mm - not far off the measurements you are aiming for. Paul
-
The usual method for producing varying heights round the trackbed would be to construct an open baseboard. I didn't follow this approach as I already had my baseboards built from the previous layout. Instead, I ascertained what height I needed the track to be at to form the under bridge and raised the trackbed on wood formers to the relevant height. For much of the layout this is just a snaking trackbed above the baseboard with the exception of the station area which has a significant area entirely built up. This method just requires careful planning and knowing what and where you want features to be positioned in order that everything is constructed prior to any track being laid. With your carpentry skills, I have no doubt you could produce a much more professional job than I managed. Paul
-
It all sounds very promising GNR. You currently have a flat baseboard constructed, how will you go about producing the height differences required to produce those features? Paul
-
I've been awaiting some progress, any pics? Paul
-
Having ripped up my previous layout in Code 100 I opted for the Code 75 this time round. This decision occurred about a year ago. I think if I had my choice again now I'd be swayed towards the Bullhead option. The points look very impressive and much less toy like and the sleeper spacing would appear more aesthetically pleasing too. Paul
- 450 replies
-
- 3
-
-
- ballyercall
- layout
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I bought my first pack of flexi from Hattons with that price in mind but was subsequently contacted and told I'd have to pay £10 shipping due to size to Northern Ireland. I think their postal rates is a default setting. Since then, I've checkedout TrackShack and discovered they do it for £76 posted. I guess, if ordering, order by phone to ensure you know the full price before committing. As for local stockists, mine took 3 months to come up with the goods as he messed about with excuse after excuse. Fortunately, I was in no hurry for it. Paul
-
I'm not sure Jhb but they are unusual and a must to model, I think. The one at the Derry end has only the single feeding arm as opposed to two arms that fed both the main and narrow gauge lines at the Belfast end. I took a look at them today and apart from that obvious difference they both would appear to be exact copies of each other, if you ignore that one is white and the other grey! I think I need to construct both of them simultaneously to ensure I follow the same methods in the build process. Will take a stroll up to them later in the week to photograph. Paul
-
Thank you everyone for the kind comments. jhb, i like that story from the Kildare cabin. I think my next build will be either the two water towers situated at either end of the platforms or the small mess house that was located close to the engine shed. All to be confirmed. Paul
-
Thanks again for all the positive comments since my last posting, really appreciated. Tonight, I downed tools for the last time on this project having painted the steps, installing the board in the box and fitting two downspouts to either end. A curious thing happened the other evening as I popped in to my local model shop checking on my order of track. I got chatting to someone and in the course of conversation we discussed our layouts. In a passing comment he mentioned the modelling of this signal box as he'd come across it on this very forum and revealed to me he was a former signalman of the actual box. I learnt a few new nuggets of information on the local station and he was also very complimentary on the build. It was a pleasure to have met him and I hope our paths will cross again Ian. Anyway, as said, the box is finished so in an attempt to show it off to its best I've photographed it against a white background to attempt to prove the lighting. Paul
-
A well made n gauge layout looks terrific with prototypical length trains but I just can't get used to the scale of it myself. For me, it's too small, detail is lost in the scenics and I think the track looks overscaled against the locos and stock. Having said that, you look at the likes of Copenhagen Fields and the scope you have to create a protypical or fictitious town round the railway makes the whole medium very tempting, if you can get past the negative aspects. Paul
-
I think most of us get those notions of long freight and coach trains in so much that we strive to make the largest layout we can. Of course that doesn't always work out for the best as the time, enthusiasm and eagerness to have something to run the trains through doesn't always reach fruition. I like the drop in board you've added to the shed, you seem to be planning ahead in the hope of creating that full loop. Seeing the boards on all four sides and knowing your thoughts on what you want to produce I would be seriously considering the N gauge option, particularly if it's a medium that you feel comfortable working with. I'm guessing the biggest stalling issue with N is the availability of Irish based stock whether that is rtr or to kit bash. Paul
-
Just unbelievable work. I think the modeller is his own worst critic knowing every little blemish and wrong path taken when striving for perfection. To everyone else, you have achieved perfection and have to deal with the green eyes of envy. Presently, I'm very very green! Paul
-
Yikes! I didn't think I'd got the signal box that wrong!! Paul
-
Patrick, that is exquisite work, just love it. Paul
-
A lovely looking snack bar, the open top windows are a nice touch. Paul
-
Hi Patrick, thank you for the very kind comments, have you any photos of your cabin in progress? If it's more photos you want from this box I should oblige. The windows have now been painted, glazing fitted, the interior installed and the steps constructed ready for painting. The steps proved a real headache and whilst not perfect will fit the task in hand. Once painted and weathered any defects should be further hidden. Happy new year to everyone. Paul
-
Tony, I hope my comments aren't disheartening, I was only making them on what I observed. Paul
-
I'm reading and re reading some of your posts and I'm getting confused. Are you modelling in N or OO - someone mentioned code 75 and someone else is mentioning n gauge. Secondly, have you settled on a complete loop plan and not an end to end? As I've said previously I am no track designer but in my eyes you seem to have a lot crammed in to the space available. You've already said the engine shed is compromised due to the turntable and you are trying to squeeze double lines out of the station. The bottom section of the layout also looks very busy - is there scope for scenics along side this? Can I ask a couple of questions? Is it your desire to have a double line running the full loop of the shed to allow trains to run? You've said about removing some sections of boards to allow for relief such as a bridge, but do you intend to include a fiddle storage yard? If not where will you store your trains when not involved in movements? Is there scope for a low level storage area to accommodate this? I'm only asking these questions because of the drawing you produced overlayed on the engineers plan. If the layout was end to end it could perhaps depict it much better than squeezing in to a roundy roundy. A spur that disappears beneath the boards could be a convenient exit point for that Enniskillen line. Could it re-enter elsewhere as part of the mainline thus giving you that continuos loop? Tony, all just musings but thought I'd throw something in to the mix. Paul
-
Makes sense. In that case I have no idea how your layout will turn out! Paul
-
Tony, if your woodwork is anything to go by this is going to be one cracking layout. Can't help you on the track plan, I've always been in the dark on this art. All I can say is I followed the plan for Ballymena as much as I could to the space available and tried to envisage trains running on the lines in all directions to make sense of positioning crossovers correctly. Look forward to more. Paul
-
NIRclass80, pm returned to you. Bantree, I look forward to seeing that, everything else I've seen of yours looks fab. Paul
-
Fantastic NIR, I've never seen a picture of it before. What strikes me most is the blanked out windows behind the lever frame, I wonder did this alteration occur after the removal of the narrow gauge line and much of the shed workings. Paul
-
NIRclass80, is that the actual signal box? Dave, thank you for the comments. Paul
-
Thank you Noel. A piece of 1mm florist wire was cut and glued at the meeting points of the tiles. Once dried, strips of duct tape (Tommy Walsh branded stuff from Poundland) were cut and laid along the florist wire and then rubbed in to the recesses of the tiles to attempt the effect of lead flashing. Everything was then primed before painting and weathering. Hope that helps. Paul