Horses for courses! I drooled over the 50200 system last year and very nearly succumbed to its lure. It is probably the best system. However its non portable games console style dual throttle base station didn't suit our layout as we would need multiple cabs at different locations, and I wasn't as keen on ESUs portable hand held cabs. The NCE was a good compromise for us due to the plug in plug out ability of the dog bone cab and I like its tactile feel in hand and its ergonomics. I do agree the Americans are rather dated and stayed in their innovation, especially some of the software's U/I and are slow to move with the times. If ESU had a decent hand held cab with physical controls, buttons and a colour display it may have swayed me. Anyway I will probably change in a few years cause I like trying out new technology and DCC systems are bound to improve a lot. On the other hand DCC needs to be radically reinvented and brought into the 21st century beyond early 1980s electronics, with high speed messaging and the burying of concepts like CVs under smart human interfaces. ESU have certainly innovated more than anybody, but are still hamstrung by NMRA's current DCC standards. The NMRA standard needs modernising!!! Apologies for drift.
PS: Don't like buttonless touch screen cabs for driving trains - need knobs, buttons or levers.