Mike 84C Posted Friday at 21:03 Posted Friday at 21:03 It's off the workbench, runs well and is as far as I want to go with it. Bit of weathering, make cab roof sit better and some wires and tube for the sander operating mech, do we know Double M models? Nice little loco and a favourite of mine, narrow gauge and runs on 16.5 mm track. Sorry about the poor photos but camera phones are not my thing, must try harder! 5 1 2
Mol_PMB Posted Friday at 21:11 Posted Friday at 21:11 Very nice! It certainly captures the style of the prototype and looks well. Do you plan any other Padarn rolling stock? 3 1
Mike 84C Posted Friday at 21:58 Author Posted Friday at 21:58 Hmm, maybe not! I remember looking at Fire Queen many years ago and thinking very strange looking loco. Two thoughts spring to mind, with that long rigid wheelbase how did it go around curves and how often did the side rods get bent? 1
Killian Keane Posted Friday at 22:07 Posted Friday at 22:07 Excellent work, I have a 3d printed version of the transporter wagons available if you're interested (since been updated with built in NEM pockets) I had the chance to examine the surviving wagon, carriage and the magnificent Fire Queen back in May and its reignited my interest in this most interesting of railways 4 1
Patrick Davey Posted Friday at 23:53 Posted Friday at 23:53 Lovely stuff and nothing wrong with the photos either! 1
Mol_PMB Posted Saturday at 06:11 Posted Saturday at 06:11 8 hours ago, Mike 84C said: Hmm, maybe not! I remember looking at Fire Queen many years ago and thinking very strange looking loco. Two thoughts spring to mind, with that long rigid wheelbase how did it go around curves and how often did the side rods get bent? Another odd thing is that there is no main frame. The boiler is the main structural component. So when it’s in steam the wheelbase is longer than when it’s cold. I can only assume there was a lot of slack in the rod ends, or maybe they were adjusted daily. 1
Colonel Posted Saturday at 06:40 Posted Saturday at 06:40 Terrific work Mike and at 4'gauge not far off correct! 1 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now