I think we all know the ‘S’ applied after the locomotive number during the CIE Supertrain era signified that the loco had been fitted with CAWS to work over the CTC-signalled lines. What I don’t know and am hoping somebody here can answer is how soon after fitting of the CAWS was this ‘S’ applied? Always instantly? Given that the initial installation of CTC covered Inchicore to Ballybrophy/Athy/Geashill, surely every mainline loco would need to have had CAWS installed as soon as CTC was launched or they’d have been severely route-restricted? So was it a case that the ‘S’ was applied on the next repaint? There were Black and Tan 141s/181s around until the very end of the 1970’s and I’m pretty sure I’ve never seen any photos of one numbered with an ‘S’ (eg B165S), which would support the ‘next repaint’ theory. Or maybe it was only applied instantly if the loco was already in Supertrain livery?
The question becomes especially relevant when considering the Murphy’s Models 121s in Supertrain Livery. Both 126 and 132 have the ‘S’, so wouldn’t be accurate for the pre-CTC era and perhaps not for a while into it either, if the policy was ‘next repaint’. That’s a little frustrating as it seems most of the Yanks were repainted into the Supertrain livery by the end of 1974 (an exception being B132 which was still in Black and Tan when involved in the fatal Gorey crash on New Year’s Eve 1975), so unless the S is manually removed, they aren’t accurate from then until the ‘S’ was applied, no earlier than 1976 and perhaps later. As I'm modelling a line that closed to all traffic in October '75, that 'S' matters!
Question
Leyny
I think we all know the ‘S’ applied after the locomotive number during the CIE Supertrain era signified that the loco had been fitted with CAWS to work over the CTC-signalled lines. What I don’t know and am hoping somebody here can answer is how soon after fitting of the CAWS was this ‘S’ applied? Always instantly? Given that the initial installation of CTC covered Inchicore to Ballybrophy/Athy/Geashill, surely every mainline loco would need to have had CAWS installed as soon as CTC was launched or they’d have been severely route-restricted? So was it a case that the ‘S’ was applied on the next repaint? There were Black and Tan 141s/181s around until the very end of the 1970’s and I’m pretty sure I’ve never seen any photos of one numbered with an ‘S’ (eg B165S), which would support the ‘next repaint’ theory. Or maybe it was only applied instantly if the loco was already in Supertrain livery?
The question becomes especially relevant when considering the Murphy’s Models 121s in Supertrain Livery. Both 126 and 132 have the ‘S’, so wouldn’t be accurate for the pre-CTC era and perhaps not for a while into it either, if the policy was ‘next repaint’. That’s a little frustrating as it seems most of the Yanks were repainted into the Supertrain livery by the end of 1974 (an exception being B132 which was still in Black and Tan when involved in the fatal Gorey crash on New Year’s Eve 1975), so unless the S is manually removed, they aren’t accurate from then until the ‘S’ was applied, no earlier than 1976 and perhaps later. As I'm modelling a line that closed to all traffic in October '75, that 'S' matters!
7 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.