Patrick Davey Posted May 20 Posted May 20 1 hour ago, Colonel said: Wibble - and beam me up Scotty. We need that J26 back... Yes please 1
Tullygrainey Posted May 20 Author Posted May 20 7 hours ago, jhb171achill said: I haven't the beginnings of a clue what yizzer talkin' about, lads. My reply to the above is therefore F6T1 89YG H4W7. I had one of those once but the wheels fell off 2
jhb171achill Posted May 20 Posted May 20 2 hours ago, Tullygrainey said: I had one of those once but the wheels fell off You should have fitted a X5S4 to it…. 1
Tullygrainey Posted May 20 Author Posted May 20 4 hours ago, jhb171achill said: You should have fitted a X5S4 to it…. I tried that but the one I had was a left handed thread and didn't fit. The gauge was wrong too. 1 1
Tullygrainey Posted May 20 Author Posted May 20 8 hours ago, Colonel said: Wibble - and beam me up Scotty. We need that J26 back... As it happens, J26 no556 was back with me this last week or so for a severe talking to. It went to its owner Kieran who painted and finished it for its career at Kirley Junction. All was well for a while but then it began to develop personality disorders, running lumpily, stopping and starting then refusing to run at all. On examination a number of issues emerged. Two of the ScaleLink wheels had developed cracks in the boss where the crankpin screws in, meaning the crankpins may not have been secure. Given that I’ve had trouble with cracking cranks on my little Kirtley project, I suspect I need to rein in my cack-handedness when fitting crankpins. The wheels were replaced with a set of Markits and running improved noticably. Then the final drive gear came loose on its axle. The gearbox that was bundled with the kit is an early High Level RoadRunner Compact Plus with a plain brass final drive cog which has no grub screw. After repeated failures to secure the cog (threadlock, superglue, shouting at it, solder! I suspect it had been over-reamed at some stage. Maybe by me) I gave 556 a fresh RRC+ gearbox. The current version has a more reliable final drive gearwheel with brass boss and grub screw. (I had intended to just use this final drive cog in the old box but the design of the box has changed and it wouldn’t fit). While fitting the motor to the new gearbox, I discovered that the motor shaft was waving about in the breeze. Not normal! IMG_5023.MOV The plastic moulding securing the motor bearing seems to have crumbled away leaving the bearing free to jiggle around. No idea what’s caused this but on reflection, it may have been one of the root causes of the stop-start problems. Anyway, 556 now has new wheels, a new motor and a new gearbox and seems infinitely happier. It has a DCC chip stowed in the boiler and a ton of lead in the tanks. The Markit wheels are insulated/uninsulated pairs so pickups are now only needed on one side. A problem halved! After trial runs at Loughan Quay, 556 is now back on home turf and earning its keep. J26 at Kirley.mov Alan 5 2
Galteemore Posted May 20 Posted May 20 What a pain Alan! Interesting defects and rather unusual. Hope mine runs as well as that one. 1
Tullygrainey Posted May 20 Author Posted May 20 1 hour ago, Galteemore said: What a pain Alan! Interesting defects and rather unusual. Hope mine runs as well as that one. I'm quite sure it will David
jhb171achill Posted May 20 Posted May 20 Great to see a layout in full 1950s mode. What's that carriage in the middle of the rake?
Colonel Posted May 21 Posted May 21 Quite a saga - rare to get such a range of faults in pretty much all the working parts, especially when they all came from different manufacturers. More than entitled to feel a bit vexed! 1 1
Tullygrainey Posted May 21 Author Posted May 21 11 hours ago, jhb171achill said: Great to see a layout in full 1950s mode. What's that carriage in the middle of the rake? Kieran, whose models those are, tells me it’s a 1st Class Saloon coach
jhb171achill Posted Thursday at 14:58 Posted Thursday at 14:58 6 hours ago, Tullygrainey said: Kieran, whose models those are, tells me it’s a 1st Class Saloon coach Yes, the GSWR had several of that ilk!
Tullygrainey Posted 16 hours ago Author Posted 16 hours ago More ThreePee. Time for the tender. A fixed rear axle and the others lightly sprung. Good old lolly sticks. My excuse for eating Magnums. Quite a lot of tricky edge to edge soldering needed here. Hard not to get the stuff everywhere. I think I used a whole fibreglass pencil cleaning this one up. ThreePee is being built with live chassis to escape from pickup purgatory. The loco has Markit insulated driving wheels one side, uninsulated ones the other, but the tender needs its Gibson wheels shorted out on one side. I've used 'spiders' from ScaleLink with the square hole in the centre reamed a little to be a tight fit on the 2mm axles. They're then soldered to the axle and to the back of the wheel rims. Belt and braces. I've done the same for the loco bogie too. Brake rigging fitted. Fiddly stuff with the bits tending to flop around everywhere until the first few joints get soldered. I looked in my notebook to see how I did it when I built Kieran's PPs a few months back. I'd written "Chassis wheeled up and brakes added" Really useful. Quite a handsome beast. The boiler furniture is just set on for the photo. Mating chassis and body always turns up the odd problem and ThreePee is no exception. The first to occur was the driving wheels locking up when the 2 chassis mounting bolts were tightened down front and back. I usually avoid two bolt attachment because it can twist the chassis and affect the running and I think that's what was happening here. I dispensed with the rear bolt and soldered a little bit of angle inside the dragbeam instead. The chassis spacer slides under this and there's a little bit of wriggle room which avoids twisting pressure on the chassis. Seemed to cure the problem, but then.... I thought I'd filed enough clearance for motor and gearbox when I built the bodywork but of course I hadn't. The wheels were grinding on something - so hard to see exactly what - and when that was cured, the gearbox cogs started clouting something too. Par for the course really. At least it is when I build them. There's always a point when I think "This thing is never gonna work" but it's usually worth persevering. After an afternoon of filing, grinding and shouting I think we're out of the woods now but who knows what will turn up next. First run under its own motive power. Loco is a bit nose up and the tender is a bit skittish through points but a promising start. Plenty to do yet. The whole rig needs added weight here and there for a start. It's running on DC at the moment but it'll be chipped once the gremlins have been banished. IMG_5077.MOV Alan 4 4
Galteemore Posted 15 hours ago Posted 15 hours ago 20 minutes ago, Tullygrainey said: More ThreePee. Time for the tender. A fixed rear axle and the others lightly sprung. Good old lolly sticks. My excuse for eating Magnums. Quite a lot of tricky edge to edge soldering needed here. Hard not to get the stuff everywhere. I think I used a whole fibreglass pencil cleaning this one up. ThreePee is being built with live chassis to escape from pickup purgatory. The loco has Markit insulated driving wheels one side, uninsulated ones the other, but the tender needs its Gibson wheels shorted out on one side. I've used 'spiders' from ScaleLink with the square hole in the centre reamed a little to be a tight fit on the 2mm axles. They're then soldered to the axle and to the back of the wheel rims. Belt and braces. I've done the same for the loco bogie too. Brake rigging fitted. Fiddly stuff with the bits tending to flop around everywhere until the first few joints get soldered. I looked in my notebook to see how I did it when I built Kieran's PPs a few months back. I'd written "Chassis wheeled up and brakes added" Really useful. Quite a handsome beast. The boiler furniture is just set on for the photo. Mating chassis and body always turns up the odd problem and ThreePee is no exception. The first to occur was the driving wheels locking up when the 2 chassis mounting bolts were tightened down front and back. I usually avoid two bolt attachment because it can twist the chassis and affect the running and I think that's what was happening here. I dispensed with the rear bolt and soldered a little bit of angle inside the dragbeam instead. The chassis spacer slides under this and there's a little bit of wriggle room which avoids twisting pressure on the chassis. Seemed to cure the problem, but then.... I thought I'd filed enough clearance for motor and gearbox when I built the bodywork but of course I hadn't. The wheels were grinding on something - so hard to see exactly what - and when that was cured, the gearbox cogs started clouting something too. Par for the course really. At least it is when I build them. There's always a point when I think "This thing is never gonna work" but it's usually worth persevering. After an afternoon of filing, grinding and shouting I think we're out of the woods now but who knows what will turn up next. First run under its own motive power. Loco is a bit nose up and the tender is a bit skittish through points but a promising start. Plenty to do yet. The whole rig needs added weight here and there for a start. It's running on DC at the moment but it'll be chipped once the gremlins have been banished. IMG_5077.MOV 31.92 MB · 0 downloads Alan That’s gorgeous Alan. Although I’m getting flashbacks……I ended up taking a Dremel to the inside of mine. I’m with you on the 2 bolt thing…. 1 1
Tullygrainey Posted 15 hours ago Author Posted 15 hours ago 1 minute ago, Galteemore said: I’m with you on the 2 bolt thing…. Rice wrote about it. He said it was amazing how many poorly running locos could be improved just by slackening off one of the bolts! 1 1
Colonel Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago Elegant work as ever. I suspect the Society of Why Don't My Models Work Without Fettling has a considerable number of members, of whom I am also a member. If I could be bothered, am sure a suitably rude sounding acronym could be formulated. 3
Patrick Davey Posted 4 hours ago Posted 4 hours ago 2 hours ago, Colonel said: Elegant work as ever. I suspect the Society of Why Don't My Models Work Without Fettling has a considerable number of members, of whom I am also a member. If I could be bothered, am sure a suitably rude sounding acronym could be formulated. WTF - Why The Fettling? 2
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now