Broithe Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 http://www.kentonline.co.uk/folkestone/news/bomb-halts-train-services-33593/ - Why do they always describe them as "unexploded"? If they had already exploded, then they wouldn't still be "bombs" and we wouldn't be worried about them exploding. Using the phrase "dug up again" is slightly worrying. Note - I have carefully avoided saying "bombs found by the railway in Kent", in case I inadvertently provoked the evacuation of Cork station..... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heirflick Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Valid point Jim. I prefer the term 'live munitions' ....... but that would probably scare the bejasus out of folk or they just might not understand, which would be worse. Nothing like the word bomb to grab peoples attention! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broithe Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 At least they're not ten-ton Grand Slams... Odd that they seem to have been found before, though.. We had a stick on the factory in WW2 and only one really went off, and nobody really knew how many there had been, either. Around 1985, we were digging a pit in the test area and hit an object about 15" diameter, where there was not supposed to be anything - it turned out to be an unknown, abandoned drain-pipe, but it was exciting for a while.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnthebox Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 http://www.kentonline.co.uk/folkestone/news/bomb-halts-train-services-33593/ - Why do they always describe them as "unexploded"? If they had already exploded, then they wouldn't still be "bombs" and we wouldn't be worried about them exploding... Isn't that what it is until it do's Explode Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noel Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Yes it reminds me of the dumb media who report a near miss instead of an air miss. Near miss = collision = crash = deceleration = g-forces = friction = heat = jet A1 in flames Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broithe Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 Isn't that what it is until it do's Explode When it's exploded, it's not a bomb any more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
burnthebox Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 When it's exploded, it's not a bomb any more. I rest my case !! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broithe Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 I rest my case !! Just don't rest it on the bomb...... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josefstadt Posted March 19, 2015 Share Posted March 19, 2015 Yes it reminds me of the dumb media who report a near miss instead of an air miss. Indeed, it would more correctly be a 'near collision'! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broithe Posted March 19, 2015 Author Share Posted March 19, 2015 "This is a near miss, that was a far away miss..." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.c363cdf5c3fb7955cd92a55eb6dbbae0.png){kind=logo}
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.