Jump to content

Basic Layouts

Rate this topic


NIR

Recommended Posts

The basic single line terminus for passenger and freight is well understood - a loop and one siding - but what about the basic junction?

IMG_20200815_103632.thumb.jpg.54dba7317269b08e024d25ade284ab78.jpg

Passenger bay with free running past but limitation getting a freight onto or off the branch.

Edited by NIR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The basic terminus (the basic single line terminus is just a special case of this)

IMG_20200815_114902.thumb.jpg.2400b9df5dbeecb9b56cb9bf077b1d58.jpg

Needs a facing crossover to allow concurrent arrivals/departures and runaround, though their order could be reversed...

IMG_20200815_120906.thumb.jpg.392ddc2cfe5452fe9a44585f8e430725.jpg

...to limit facing moves but I suspect it all comes down to whether you want to prioritise arrivals or departures when signalling an intense service.

Edited by NIR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jhb171achill said:

Yes, but if a train is coming from the right, and going up the branch, he needs to be able to get across without reversing.......

Trying to think of examples, but didn't Ballybrophy require reversal off the mainline to gain the line to Limerick via Nenagh from the Cork line for Dublin-Limerick trains when the Nenagh line was the mainline to Limerick?

 

Also, the Midland Railway in Great Britain studiously avoided facing points wherever possible, Garsdale on the Settle & Carlisle required a double reversal to gain the branch to Hawes from the bay platform for example.

 

Not sure if any Irish railway companies followed the same practice as the British Midland?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jhb171achill said:

Yes, but if a train is coming from the right, and going up the branch, he needs to be able to get across without reversing.......

That's only really required for through passenger workings. A freight from the right is easier than one from (or to) the left though.

Edited by NIR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, hexagon789 said:

Not sure if any Irish railway companies followed the same practice as the British Midland?

Yes these are just functional, not prototypical to a company or era, but there's a lot more of it around these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The norm was facing points to a junction both here and Britain. 

Naturally there were exceptions, but usually for a practical reason. Ballybrophy was exceptional as it faced Cork rather than Dublin.

Take Mallow as a better example. You could come up from Cork and go direct onto the Waterford line. That was the norm.

An example like the plan above gives more shunting possibilities on a small layout, of course!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Antrim onto the Lisburn line looks like a good example, access via the right hand line from somewhere on the other side of the station back when Belfast-Ballymena was double track, and there's even a passenger bay!

IMG_20200815_174923.thumb.jpg.db21e8a61c727a868bee04a6a8f58f3d.jpg

(Parting Shot/N Johnston)

Edited by NIR
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jhb171achill said:

The norm was facing points to a junction both here and Britain. 

Naturally there were exceptions, but usually for a practical reason. Ballybrophy was exceptional as it faced Cork rather than Dublin.

Take Mallow as a better example. You could come up from Cork and go direct onto the Waterford line. That was the norm.

An example like the plan above gives more shunting possibilities on a small layout, of course!

Sorry, I didn't mean time imply facing points were the exception just that there's a few interesting examples where junction access is trailing against the direction of the main traffic flow

1 hour ago, NIR said:

Antrim onto the Lisburn line looks like a good example, access via the right hand line from somewhere on the other side of the station back when Belfast-Ballymena was double track, and there's even a passenger bay!

IMG_20200815_174923.thumb.jpg.db21e8a61c727a868bee04a6a8f58f3d.jpg

(Parting Shot/N Johnston)

Nice somersaults

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The junction with minimal access, the terminus with no capacity for tidal flow, both clearly reductions to absurdity but perhaps of some value when compressing things into an essence.

Everything else? Well that's easy

IMG_20200815_205440.thumb.jpg.44bbad75d670d75e3a4e28cfd85ff702.jpg

Edited by NIR
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small brook junction to Ryde on the IOW was in winter time was run as a pair of parallel single lines with the scissors junction out of use.

If you take it that point work off scene - hinted at by signals visible then just two lines as above quite feasible.  

By some careful signage you could imply one line was bidirectional with a cross over off stage left and the single lead turnout off stage right , like Cherryville .

Equally if you placed a platform between the lines you could do a Manulla junction.

I get my coat ! 

Robert 

    

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use