Jump to content

hurricanemk1c

Members
  • Posts

    628
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by hurricanemk1c

  1. The BAe Hawk was built under license by McDonnell Douglas I believe - it's OK if it is built in America post World War Two. The USAAF also operated Mosquitos. According to Wikipedia, the US Military use a handful of other nationality aircraft - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_States_military_aircraft
  2. Just look at the KC-X programme - the A330 was selected, then unselected and a 40 year ago basic airframe that is now out of commerical production (and was finished completely) in the form of the 767 selected. Nothing, but nothing, was going to prevent Air Force One being a 747-8 Looks like a general video rather than a dedicated Air Force One
  3. Evening all, A 11 mile trek around Portlaoise to see the Engineering Works on at Milepost 48 (Straboe). Photos include the top and tail HOBS and various track machines at work. A video of 743 tamping will be availalbe tomorrow All photos can be seen here - Regards, Kieran
  4. There is - not much but you can tell looking in
  5. Think you can, but seriously not recommended. There's a story somewhere of a loco inspector loosing his head (literally) when the engine threw a leg out of bed as he was inspecting the engine whilst it was running
  6. 2200 arrival into Connolly on Thursday with 85. Will head out to the Northern Line for shots of the 111
  7. Both RAF Bomber Command and the US 8th Air Force suffered the highest casualty rate of any Allied service. For example, New Zealanders in Bomber Command made up around 1.5% of the total service effort and suffered 20% of the overall casualties. By late 1944 the occupation of Night Fighter pilot in the Luftwaffe was one of the most dangerous of all Luftwaffe postings. Because of the damage caused, we hope never to see it again. Interestingly, the fallout afterwards weighed against Bomber Command's city-bombing, despite the US Air Force using the same tactics in the Pacific and Europe, and the atomic weapon can hardly be called precision!
  8. There is a recording somewhere in the archives from a Master Bomber late-war in 1945, made throughout the raid. Incredible stories from the air. Of note is the first Me-262 shot down by RAF Bomber Command was from a .5in turret, with a sum total of 50 rounds fired by F/Sgt. Ken O'Brien of 101 Squadron. The trilogy by Kevin Wilson on the bomber war opens up your eyes to a service that suffered just under 50% casulties (dead, not wounded)
  9. Maximum Pasenger Train Size must not exceed: 10 MKIV vehicles 8 De-Dietrich Push/Pull vehicles 8 8100/8200/8500/510/8520 Class EMU's 9 ICR (22000) Class DMU's 8 2600 Clas DMU's 10 2700 Class DMU's 10 2800 Class DMU's 8 29000 Class DMU's All DMU/EMU size refers to number of vehicles, not number of sets (ie 2x4 Class 29000 rather than 8x4 Class 29000) Maximum Passenger Train Load mus not exceed 430 tonnes. 12 ICR permitted between Laois Traincare Depot and Heuston only
  10. 201s are definately more powerful than MKIV Control Cars - about 2,340hp more. Mark 4 Control Generator Cars do nothing for traction. The 201 fleet is an absolute mess, due to being three different orders. 201-205 / 210-214 do not have push pull equipment fitted, different bearings on the bogies and other differences, compared to 215-226/229/232/234. 206/207/8208/8209/227/228/230 have NIR equipment and are thus restricted to those duties (the law in the North states that all stock must have AWS, TPWS, NIR Train Radio etc, or have a second competent person on board. I know which is cheaper day-to-day). Then you have the level of work required. As of today, there's 6 booked Class 201 diagrams. 5 Dublin-Cork and 1 Dublin-Belfast. Requirement of about 8 locos total, including time for A, B exams etc. Then freight. 3 flows (IWT, DFDS, Timber). Up to three IWT's a day, one timber and one DFDS - 6 locos. 14 out of 34 needed, based on just 201 usage. I make the current fleet to be 20 available for work (21 including 8208 under overhaul). Find the work first! Apologies - answered twice before my post went up
  11. Subject to much debate - but if they were every recorded doing that (and personally don't believe they ever did), it certaintly wasn't in regular passenger service. 2 hours 15 (2 hours 12 WTT time) is very impressive. It is about the minimum time at the moment, hence the ballast cleaning going on. Better ballast bed can bring higher speeds. Average speed of 73.4 mph start to stop
  12. So, are you suggesting a small sub-fleet on an already streched fleet just to accomodate them, and for one or two runs a day? Good luck with getting a solid business case for that! Curtains are a pain to install, keep clean and generally keep up, hence why they are only ever in first class. Then when a curtained set turns up on other diagrams, people begin to wonder 'why do I get x train when I can get the same on y train?'. Tinted windows cost more as well, due to the additional processes required. Also - Bigger seats = less seats = higher price per passenger. Higher Price (especially with a 'normal' train 20 mins before) = Lower Demand. Good old economics After many, many hours at 0645-0900 and then on the return anywhere between 1600-2000 (and sometimes on the 2210 Heuston - Portlaoise) on ICR's, can't find the seats that bad. True, not as good as the Mark 3 seats but they no longer pass EU safety regulations. An informed source quotes £800,000 for a new rail-compliant seat. Find the money and a good, solid business case and the seat will follow - and maybe it will be comfortable! Concorde worked perfectly for 20-25 years - and the seats weren't that comfortable! Can't comment on food as I don't eat anything on-board, but I think Iarnród Éireann (through Rail Gourmet) know exactly what comes through the trolley till and what comes through a dedicated buffet service. I think I know which wins, and people vote with their wallets. A new Intercity station on the M50? That [M50] is already packed out and any little thing makes the whole system fall over. Same with the proposed Phoenix Park Tunnel idea - one delay on the Connolly side or Heuston side and chaos. Building a station by the M50 would just increase costs and pain for people travelling I've seen many, many people working on a train without curtains (myself included) on a variety of devices. jhb171achill: Having just finished commuting on ICR's from Portlaoise to Heuston (something in the region of 11,000 miles since September) at all times from 0645 to 2330 at Portlaoise, heat never been a problem for me, and I hate high temperatures. If you have a problem, have you complained with all the relevant details? The average temperature I have seen is about 18-20 degrees. I do know of services that were terminated due to high interior temperatures and failed HVAC sets, so complain if you have a problem. In fact, the information stickers on the ICR's, if you had noticed, mention HVAC as a specific clause (see - http://www.thewandererphotos.com/2014Photos/November-2014/i-tKzr3cp) So we are back to the start - how to provide a non-stop trip from Cork to Heuston at minimum cost to attract passengers and keep within the fleet capabilities and crew capabilities. Personally, I think Iarnród Éireann have done themselves proud (despite NTA worries). Instead of complaining at every decision made by Iarnród Éireann, why not praise one or two? Unfortunately, it's not just a case of going down to the local shop to get a few things and bolting it on. For example, the provision of curtains would have to go through an EU tender, review, selection and then fitting. Six months minimum, regardless of whether it is here or Germany. Sum total - find the money and the product could follow. As I said before - the market decides. Early days yet, don't forget, with this being week 2 (and Tuesday at that). And what's not been discussed is knock-on effects. Whilst the 0615 is on-time / early at Heuston, it's been +5 at Portarlington all last week, with the result that the 0525 Westport - Heuston (retimed +5 at Heuston) is another 5 down at Heuston - not happy people! As always, just my opinions!!!
  13. Should add: 2011/2012 - Second batch of 22000 Class enter service 2013 - New "Iarnród Éireann Irish Rail" logo introduced 2014 - Enterprise refurbishment announced, with 8209 receiving partial livery 2014 - Class 22000 have formal approval for cross-border work, starting by covering an Enterprise set for refurb 2014/2015 - Belmond start moving their Mark 3's to Scotland. Last Mark 3 movement in orange/black 2015 - Top and Tail working now permitted with HOBS wagons 2015 - Single Line Working and Ballast Cleaning, finally using 781 to its full potential 2015 - 206 repainted in full Enterprise livery and MMI screens fitted
  14. On the contrary - IÉ do want it to work. However, with a fleet of 10x 5ICR, one of which is on Enterprise, one or two are down for attention, leaving a maximum of 8 around for other work. In the evening peak, the 1600 Heuston - Cork, 1625 Heuston - Limerick, 1630 Heuston - Galway, 1705 Heuston - Tralee, 1725 Heuston - Limerick, 1815 Heuston - Westport, 1830 Heuston - Galway and 1835 Heuston - Waterford. . Whilst I do not have the links, that is from observation at Heuston. Total use there is 8 sets, most of them full both in standard and first People moan (not anyone here, just general) that IÉ are 'carting around fresh air' and now that they match capacity with demand people are moaning. As a comparision, a 3 ICR accomodates 190 passengers, compared to 36/268 (first/standard) for a 5 ICR or 44/373 (first/standard) for a Mark 4 rake. Find the extra 110-200 people and the diagrams will change
  15. Hope this helps (click on the photo for it larger) Roof of 7601, North Wall, 20/12/14 by Kieran Marshall, on Flickr
  16. The offical reason is to enable it to run with the Heritage (Wooden) stock and not to show up diesel stains. Whilst it looks good, I doubt the Heritage set will ever run again. More than willing to be proved wrong though!
  17. Good morning all, A couple of shots from Hazelhatch in the morning (20/5/15): Due to a Road Traffic Accident involving a car and tram 4003, trams from The Point were terminating and reversing at Smithfield, utilising the little-used crossover between Smithfield and Four Courts Full set here - A selection of shots from yesterday's Engineering Works, with photos from:. Heuston Newbridge (and the worksite) Stacummy Bridge Kildare Portarlington Full set can be seen here - Regards, Kieran
  18. What will be interesting is who pays for the damage - loco owned by Network Rail, work done by the Type 1 Loco Association and used by the Great Central Railway, with 80301 owned by Railway Vehicle Preservations Ltd. (although indirectly involved, since it was just coupled to the loco)
  19. Good evening all, A few updates from me. 231 at Heuston, 13/5/15 with a few odds and sods of Heuston Portlaoise, 14/5/15 and a couple of shots, including 206 on the 1700 Heuston - Cork Heuston, 15/5/15, with 206 waiting for transfer to Inchicore Full set of photos from May are here - Regards, Kieran
  20. There's nothing on recent photos, but could just be the standard door guides at the top having been replaced but not painted. Without a shot of it, I can't tell
  21. Then yes - see photo below: http://www.thewandererphotos.com/2007photos/July-2007/i-ddVrxGW And again (Mark 3's due to the underfloor casing) - Kieran
  22. In what livery (the two tone purpley one or the green and silver one)? More than likely did
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use