Jump to content

Donowhattocallit

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Posted

New Layout Description:

Celbridge started April 2016 is no more, I’ve lifted the track and started afresh.

My shed is 3.4 m x 2.2 m and the layout is to run around the circumference. Depth of layout is 500mm all the way round. I have it set at a height of around 760mm so that I can sit comfortably in the chair and work away at it.

Unlike Celbridge this layout is going to be end to end. Experimenting with track plans at the moment.

I have added an extension to baseboard for return loop (non scenic) at one end and terminus station at the other end.

Here is track plan.

Donowhattocallit Rev A.jpg

  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted

I do no whattocallit. “Kingsbridge”.

I wanted a terminus station like Heuston, with the return loop hidden by a scenic break, probably road overbridge. I run trains to Cork and then they return.

What we think will fit in our heads and what actually fits are two different storys.

Now I have a fairly big room for my layout, however the first plan doesn’t work, not enough room for platforms with a least 3 carriages.

I have revised it as shown. Because the return loop is done with diamond crossing there was no issue with electrical short circuit. However, the introduction of the Y junction creates a continous loop.

I like the symmetry of the Y junction and it allows for two decent sized platforms, with 3 lines.

Currently, and I’m still just playing around, the single power controller is located at the green track in the middle line.

To prevent short circuits, I have used isolated tracks shown in red as per Hornby Track Plans 8th Ed (£4.99) P. 30.

Lots of switching on/off isolated sections depending on which arm of Y junction is chosen.

 

 

 

 

Kingsbridge  RevA.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Paddy Mac Namara said:

I do no whattocallit. “Kingsbridge”.

I wanted a terminus station like Heuston, with the return loop hidden by a scenic break, probably road overbridge. I run trains to Cork and then they return.

What we think will fit in our heads and what actually fits are two different storys.

Now I have a fairly big room for my layout, however the first plan doesn’t work, not enough room for platforms with a least 3 carriages.

I have revised it as shown. Because the return loop is done with diamond crossing there was no issue with electrical short circuit. However, the introduction of the Y junction creates a continous loop.

I like the symmetry of the Y junction and it allows for two decent sized platforms, with 3 lines.

Currently, and I’m still just playing around, the single power controller is located at the green track in the middle line.

To prevent short circuits, I have used isolated tracks shown in red as per Hornby Track Plans 8th Ed (£4.99) P. 30.

Lots of switching on/off isolated sections depending on which arm of Y junction is chosen.

 

 

 

 

Kingsbridge  RevA.jpg

I’d say that will work a whole lot better. Presumably multiple unit operation primarily, or push-pull?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use