Jump to content

NIR 111 double heading trials

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Posted

Just wanted to ask about NIR doing trials with 111 and 113 in multiple. I understand this is for ballast relaying work due shortly involving spoil and ballast wagons. What I can't my head around is what on the NIR network will require the power of 2 111s to shift?

IE use a single 071 to haul the heaviest freight trains running today, that are the laden tara mines. In permanent way work the most I've seen them haul for practical reasons was 10 laden HOBS and an 071 tailing at the rear on top and tail works.

If anyone has any insight as to what NIR need all that power for I'd love to know.

 

Posted

It might be they will separate at some point and one will pull ballast wagons and the other will pull spoil wagons.

Here is an old picture of double heading, not my picture.

 

 

113 NIR Red warning panel..jpg

  • Like 1
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I'm not sure if this is the right section to put this in, but 111 worked a recovery service today for 228 which failed while working the 20.50 Enterprise on Tuesday. I took a photo of it as it powered through Dundalk with 228 in tow, which is attached to this comment. I also have a few photos of (8)111, 228 and 074 in Connolly which I took earlier this evening, which I can post tomorrow if ye want to see them!

DSC_1760.jpg

Edited by Gortalainn
Numerical error
  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, popeye said:

Yes, post the pictures please. 

I don't seem to be able to attach the photos, I get a notification saying that the upload failed every time I try to attach them to the message

Posted
9 minutes ago, Gortalainn said:

I don't seem to be able to attach the photos, I get a notification saying that the upload failed every time I try to attach them to the message

Try reducing the file size and uploading again... :)

Posted
On 1/5/2018 at 12:36 AM, Garfield said:

Try reducing the file size and uploading again... :)

Still no luck, this is the error message I'm getting: "There was a problem processing the uploaded file. -200"

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted
On ‎1‎/‎10‎/‎2018 at 5:11 AM, Railer said:

111+113 failed early this morning while on PWD works causing all sorts of problems on part of the NIR network. 

if 111+113 failed, did 112 come to the rescue?

Posted

Think 112 is or was out for maintenance, that's why NIR had 216 on loan for 3 weeks on ballast duties with 111+113 on spoil. 216 went back home yesterday for a routine maintenance exam. 8208 went back north to replace it.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Does anyone know why they need two?

And - what is it about NIR that they consistently can't seem to keep just three of a class in reliable use, when IE have for forty years kept 18 of the same class with well above average levels of reliability?

It was the same with the few C class that NIR had in the 1980s, some of which rarely turned a wheel at all; and the trio of Hunslets, though these were nowhere as good a locomotive as anything GM.

For NIR to have double headed superpower on a ballast train of three or four trucks, is like IE putting an 071 or two 141s on the two-coach Ballina branch train. For both out of just a trio to fail, is like Mayo putting in two own goals in the All-Ireland final....

Oh, wait......

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use