David Holman
Members-
Posts
3,894 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
107
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Resource Library
Events
Gallery
Blogs
Store
Community Map
Everything posted by David Holman
-
Interesting and thank you. The donkey cart is a Langley Kit and was made up as is. Always thought the shafts looked odd, so will definitely straighten them.
-
As with the layout, I've pretty much finished tinkering for now, though one final bit of work before Uckfield has been to fit AJs to SLNCR bogie No 10, the famous [or should that be infamous?] saloon which did not benefit from any internal lighting - as evidence by the lack of a cable conduit on the roof. There were three similar coaches [No9 was a brake third], built by Hurst Nelson in 1928 to replace some six wheelers damaged in the Civil War. Among their many foibles were doors that were hung on the right, first class compartments split longitudinally into smoking and non-smoking compartments, plus the archaic clerestory roof and the fact they were less than 45 feet long - the latter ideal for a small layout like NPQ. In the 1950s Brake 3rd No9 had a bit of a repaint, but No10 stayed in pretty woeful condition, so this is how I've represented it. Originally, I'd not tried to fit AJs to this coach, as there didn't seem room on the chassis, particularly with the bogie pivots being in the way. However, another look showed it should be possible & so this has proved, though I've had to chop a couple of sections out of the bogie frames to allow the coupling wire to move up & down. The 6w brake third is currently now in reserve.
-
Finished? Is a model railway ever finished? Probably not, but currently am thinking this is as far as I want to take things for now, because I don't want to overload what is quite a small scene with too much detail. A few more small details have been added, plus the donkey cart is now on scene too. You can look for a station barrow, the Collooney 'dog box', a chap reading his paper and some 'enamel' advertising signs. The paint brush has been busy too, touching up here and there. I've taken a load of pictures, mainly as a bit of proof reading to see if there are any glaring errors. If anybody spots anything, feel free to post. The Austin Seven will only be present in the 1950s period, of course.
- 209 replies
-
- 18
-
Nearly three months since my last workshop post! Main reason for this being layout work, but in amongst all the testing of stock [and in particular the Alex Jackson couplings], the last few days have begun addressing the cosmetic aspects of my stock. Some of my locos and stock are veterans of 40 shows with Arigna Town, while being the custodian of some of the late Richard Chown's stuff means these can be over 40 years old. Indeed WL&WR 0-6-0 'Shannon' is now nearly 50. Anyway, one item certainly in need of some TLC was Richards's GSWR brake van. As can be seen from the photo below, it has certainly suffered from the ravages of time: Mainly this was down to broken steps, plus a missing brake shoe. Stock on the vast Castle Rackrent system certainly had to work hard for its living! Construction of the brake van was very much of its time, with a piece of wood used as the floor, to which various pieces of plastic sheet were added to build up the body, plus whitemetal castings for things like axle boxes, buffers and the like. The steps were all plastic, so I simply repacked like for like, but with the advantage of having cyano as an adhesive. A touch up of the paintwork and all now seems well again, though I really ought to add a running number, weights and so on. Note the fixings for the AJ couplings on the brake van. Richard seems to have favoured a U shaped piece of brass strip, screwed to the underside of the wagon, to which the coupling wires were soldered. In the last few months, I've made dozens of the things [add adjective of choice here, maybe] & have been slowly getting my head around how to make them work well. Maybe I should have bought the book [yes, there is one] and certainly could have been more analytical and less trial and error, but am at last getting there. The basic shape is shown below: This is in 1mm brass wire [for clarity], rather than the 28swg steel piano wire I actually use. The 'nose' is the important bit, being 10mm long, with a 180 degree fold to create two 5mm arms. The top one is bent 45 degrees upwards and 30 degrees to the right. This bit keeps two adjacent couplings apart [especially once uncoupled]. The lower arm [bent at 60 degrees downwards] is the hook that couples two vehicles together. Happily, these angles do not need to be precise. It should go without saying that the rest of the wire should be both straight and on the centre line of the vehicle - especially the part that projects beyond the buffer beam. For some reason, the one shown below had to be replaced - I'll leave you to work out why! Probably the bit that causes me most pain is the soft iron dropper, which is used to uncouple a pair of vehicles over an electro magnet [via a push to make switch]. Getting the length of this right is critical. Too long and it fouls the magnet/shorts on the rails, etc etc. Too short and the magnet will not be able to attract it. I really ought to have managed to make a jig for the [insert expletive here] things, though by moving the arms together or apart, a degree of adjustment is possible. The third item is a U shaped piece of wire needed as a 'stop' to prevent the accentuator being pulled down too low and catching on the track. The latter goes over an axle [apart from on locos], while the former is fitted just in front of the axle. Everything else about the AJ coupling is simple [!] alignment. Fine if you only have straight track, but ever tighter curves start to create problems. I have at least made a simple gauge to check the vertical and horizontal alignment of the coupling wires - essential when stock is repeatedly taken in & out of storage boxes, for even a millimetre or so misalignment means the coupling will not connect. It can all be a pain in the fundament, but when working well, the AJ is very effective and I'm glad I have persevered. Very unobtrusive, and [unlike the Dingham] not 'handed', so it goes nicely with my turntable fiddle yard. Less precision is required in terms of sighting the uncoupling magnets and AJs will even uncouple wagons on the move if you drive slowly. If I'm honest, I would still be happy with three link couplings and the hand from the sky, but this is really not appropriate for a front operated shunting layout, so AJs it is.
-
Over 800,000 views! Remarkable, well done.
-
Lovely paint job!
-
One of these days, I will get back to making something because since I completed the E class kit, everything has revolved around getting NPQ exhibition ready. At times, it has seemed that I've done little but tinker and fettle with the Alex Jackson couplings - though at least I largely understand them now, in particular, what you can get away with... hopefully [!]. However, a tag from Galteemore & Ernie's amazing photo archive got me looking at some early Arigna Town stuff, to whit a certain dog/lion/dragon/leprechaun box on a Sligo Leitrim platform. It had caught my attention to the extent that I did indeed make a model, which still resides at Belmullet/Arigna Town. Made of plastic sheet and strip, it was lettered with a white gel pen. Meanwhile, going through all my stock to pick out the better/most appropriate items for NPQ, I've included a couple of SLNCR cattle vans, to go with a more recent GSWR open cattle van and a couple of horse boxes. The Sligo cattle vans were batch built as a rake of five, though sadly, I fear they are too small, having used the Alphagraphix card kit as a drawing. However, they still look the part on NPQ, including one with a load of hand made cattle. I used DAS clay on a 'skeleton' of plastic sheet, suitably filed to shape and painted to look a bit like Irish Moyles. I cheated a bit with them as they have simple, straight legs, which can't be seen inside the van. Later, I made a small herd of more detailed cattle, with properly shaped legs and painted black to represent Galloways. These have been grazing on Belmullet for a few years, but thought it would be nice to put them in the GSWR open van, as can been seen below.
- 209 replies
-
- 20
-
Impressive stuff, Ken. Tricky things, turntables.
-
Back to Basics Question. Painting a dark item white.
David Holman replied to dave182's question in Questions & Answers
Yep, or start with something like a car grey, rattle can primer and then spray or brush your white on top of that. -
Clogherhead - A GNR(I) Seaside Terminus
David Holman replied to Patrick Davey's topic in Irish Model Layouts
Good stuff. Colour is always difficult to gauge, but that seems right - besides which the colour of concrete can change considerably depending on light, recent rain, weathering and so on. Have yet to find a tin of concrete coloured paint that looks anything like the real stuff, but when you think about it, the composition (especially if lots of gravel included) is far from uniform anyway. -
Scary stuff...
-
Omelettes and eggs...
-
Life is complicated - which is why it is fun. Allegedly, anyway... Like your thinking.
-
Don't let anyone say that building coaches is easy! Timewise, I reckon a coach can take as long as some locos. That suspension certainly looks dainty and as GM says, should run well too.
-
I'm really pleased I took the opportunity to do a dress rehearsal with NPQ last Sunday. Every time you take a layout to a show, you learn something new about it [mostly through something going wrong], so am very much hoping the experience will improve things for its proper debut at Uckfield. Much of this week has been spent fettling various bits and pieces, including a nasty kink in one rail in the runnel and making sure the track is smooth across the joints from the fiddle yard to the layout. Some more weight at the front of the Deutz means that can now earn its living again too. Another issue which came up was that we could run the whole sequence of seven trains in not much more than 20 minutes - mainly because only two were doing any shunting, with the rest just 'out and back'. Solving this caused much stirring of the grey matter, but eventually worked out that I could swap a wagon from the mixed train into the right hand siding, as per a similar move using the J26 and its short goods. It turned out to be a bit more complicated than that though because to make this happen several wagons needed to have AJ couplings added, while the same thing was also needed for two trains on the 1900s period. While doing this, I decided that several wagons needed swapping around as their chassis were less than perfect and really could do with some compensation units added. However, for now, there is enough spare stock without resorting to major surgery, though I must admit it will be nice to get back to some proper modelling once Uckfield is out the way - my broad gage stock hadn't turned a while for over two years, so a lot of servicing has been needed, plus the fitting [and testing] of all those couplings! Some cosmetic work is still required too... Anyway, here are a few pictures of the J26 and its revised train. Quite an eclectic mix too, with a 'modern' H van, followed by an ancient Sligo 'semi', an equally antediluvian GNRI box van, to say nothing of the ex GSWR brake bringing up the rear. After running round, the loco removes the brake and GN van, moving these to the headshunt. The loco can then pick up the van in the right hand siding [in this case a Sligo box van] and attach this to the brake. The GNR van can then be pushed into the siding, after which the Sligo van and brake go to the headshunt, under the crane. Finally, after running round and coupling up the four wagons, the train is ready to depart, as the signal shows! This third shunting move helps balance the overall sequence with three out of seven trains doing more than just run round. Remembering to shuttle the crane up and down should mean the sequence now last about 30-40 minutes. There is quite a scoop for this year's Uckfield show, with no less than five of Iain Rice's layouts appearing. NPQ will try and match that on the Sunday, with no less than five SLNCR 0-6-4Ts on show: thanks to Galteemore coming to help. Ok, the layout is only one engine in steam, but the photo opportunities should be good!
- 209 replies
-
- 19
-
Splendid! For such a small area, it has a very spacious look to it.
-
Amen to the above, but would also add craft knives with snap off blades. It is only the tip which goes blunt, so the snap off gives a new, sharp one with minimum effort.
-
Page 7 of my David's Work bench shows the Alphagraphix solution to a 6w chassis, Alan. Simple, but quite elegant and has worked well on all my 6w coaches. Probably just another variation on the theme, but hopefully it might help.
-
Couple of hundred hours work to create a model of that, I'd think...
-
Very Worsley Works - no instructions or fittings - but very much worth it. Who'd have thought etchings for something that obscure would be produced? They look good too.
-
All things being equal, NPQ's dress rehearsal worked out fairly well today. There was a great atmosphere in Chatham Dockyard for its 1940s weekend, with lots of people in costume, including many in Services uniform. Can't have been much for for some of them as it was over 90F and humid too... Chatham Model club were in the Engine Shed, with two industrial diesels for company. The floor was nice and flat, so no complaints about setting up, while everything fits in my car - albeit pretty snugly. At first, things didn't go well - thought my controller had failed, until I realised that I'd plugged in all three transformers in the wrong sockets... Once that was sorted, the layout ran reasonably well. The Alex Jackson couplings still need a bit more adjustment, while one of the wagons needs replacing, pending a chassis rebuild because it derails. Two of the locos didn't function well, though it turns out to be my own fault. The Deutz needed a bit more lead ballast, but I added two much at one end, so it is very unbalanced and won't pull anything in one direction. Same problem with the J19, where in refixing the fall plate between loco and tender I'd inadvertently lifted the rear drivers a fraction off the rails. The latter easily fixed, but just as well I took 0-4-2T Lark with me, which proved an ideal substitute for the little diesel. A short list of other bits and pieces requires attention - but at least I know before its first proper outing to Uckfield next month, when hopefully it will not be quite so hot! Below are a few pictures from the day.
- 209 replies
-
- 22
-
Great to see the new loco at work!
-
Clever! The Sligo 0-6-4 tanks likewise require a bogie with side play/springs and need careful driving on Northport Quay - though they shouldn't be going fast in such a confined space anyway...
-
A little beauty Ken. Will be great to see it paired with the coaches.
-
Thanks chaps - looks like my model is not a million miles from a Swilly co!our scheme (they seem to have had plenty!); perhaps a red roof and new decals?