Track query

[burnthebox]

Hey guys anyone on here know anything about this set of tracks, the ones nearest to camera, as there’s an obvious difference between the two sets, & btw, if I’ve used someone’s photo without permission I’ll just have to apologise here & now, but it’s innocence on my part here as I do not know who’s photos this belongs to,TIA,

Regards

BTB

 

I THINK THIS BELONGS ON A DIFFERENT PAGE ANYONE MODS ETC WHO CAN REFIT THIS TO WHERE IT BELONGS...!

Edited January 4, 2021 by burnthebox
WRONG PAGE

[Noel]

7 minutes ago, burnthebox said:

Hey guys anyone on here know anything about this set of tracks, the ones nearest to camera, as there’s an obvious difference between the two sets, & btw, if I’ve used someone’s photo without permission I’ll just have to apologise here & now, but it’s innocence on my part here as I do not know who’s photos this belongs to,TIA,

Regards

BTB

Hi Paul. Looks like WMRC Little Siddington O gauge layout. The track is Peco O gauge. Noel

Edited January 4, 2021 by Noel

[Galteemore]

I think the ballasting is the difference / the background tracks are fully ballasted as befits a main line. The foreground track looks more like a siding. 

[burnthebox]

5 minutes ago, Noel said:

Hi Paul. Looks like WMRC Little Siddington O gauge layout. The track is Peco O gauge. Noel

Hi & many thanks Noel, but which track is O gauge, the near or the far & what gauge is the other one, & is that all Wooden..!  because one of those tracks is really life like...!!
tia

Paul

[Galteemore]

It’s all O gauge Paul, with plastic sleepers. Here is a shot on my old O gauge layout under construction, showing the bare track on a sector plate next to scenically treated stuff. 
 

Edited January 4, 2021 by Galteemore

[NIR]

I think it's just a wide angle camera view making the nearer track gauge seem wider, the furthest track looks narrower still

[David Holman]

Plus the nearest track seems at a slightly higher level, which also makes a difference.

[burnthebox]

On 4/1/2021 at 9:31 PM, burnthebox said:

 

Hi guys, & thanks, now I’ve been looking at these sets of tracks again, !  & im convinced that the sleepers on the track on the other side of those two “ lads “ is different than the sleepers on the nearest set.! So what’s your opinion on this, TIA

BTB

[Robert Shrives]

Hi 

The sleepering looks to be ever so slighty wider on the mainlines at the back which is what you have picked upon.  For me the neat baseboard join is very well executed, it does not shout "fault line." So well done to the builders.    

[RobertRoche]

I think what we are seeing here is a wider sleeper used under the points. If you look at the mainlines to the background of the picture you will see that the sleepers on those lines appear narrower and at a different spacing. Here is another picture from Little Siddington which you can find on its layout thread.

 

[David Holman]

Indeed. Point timbers could be 12 inches wide, whereas plain track usually had nine inch timbers.

[burnthebox]

Well guys, many thanks, so I’ve been zooming down to as close as possible to hear..! What those two are saying, & b6 doing that you can see, well I can, specsavers et all, a size difference, in width of the sleepers between the nearest track & the main line tracks, I’m only interested in these sets of track because of the apparent difference in them, the main tracks look so real..! I’d very much like to think the main line track is Peco code 100 or 75, Bullhead, nickel silver, flexi track...! As it looks the bus...!
tia

BTB

Edited January 21, 2021 by burnthebox