Jump to content

jhb171achill

Members
  • Posts

    14,271
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    329

Everything posted by jhb171achill

  1. Outstanding! I'm sure it'll find a good home!
  2. I'm in the bin now, Broithe. It's dark in here...... just like in the postcard you're holding above!
  3. Is it powered by Arlene's woodchips? :-)
  4. As said above, Bantry station didn't change much - indeed, most stations on that system didn't either. Had it survived, the only probable change today would be the goods yard tarred over as a car park. Again, I take my hat off to the folks modelling it, and while set in the mid 50s (make it late 50s so you can include "C"s!) by simply running black'n'tan on it, a completely convincing 1965 appears, and operating maroon six wheelers instead of green ones takes you back to 1925 easily. The beauty about that is that all steam locos on the line were grey right through from mid 1920s to the end of steam, so the loco doesn't have to change. Some locos in West Cork kept their numberplates to the end instead of having the large numbers painted on by CIE, while others - even if they DID get the painted numbers - only got them late on (e.g. No. 90). Therefore, if the steam stock has painted over grey numberplates (not black, as at least one book suggests), then it can be set in any period at all from 1925 to 1961.
  5. Could be, Andy; there's not one rule without an exception! Twas all the theory of some psychologist, I think; I don't remember the rest of the article though it made interesting reading and whether by accident or design would fit three generations of my clan....... maybe not others.....
  6. They're in my garage, gentlemen. I'm keeping them for when the Achill line is reopened...... they will go along with 800 there very nicely. I just LOVE mushrooms!
  7. I think it was taken about 1956. It is indeed that bridge.
  8. I read an article years and years ago somewhere which examined the psychology of those who follow hobbies in general. Apparently, hobbies which deal in the past - anything historical - and much of model railwaying falls squarely into this category - will commonly be based in, or find primary interest in, a period immediately before the enthusiast was born. This is because we see adventure in this as we did not yet know it, and yet it is comparatively recent so we can relate to it. What do ye all think of that! It's true! My earliest years of "railway consciousness" were the early 1960s. I can remember a 121 newly painted black'n'tan from grey, NCC and GNR steam, AEC railcars as if it was yesterday, and trips on the Ardee and Loughrea branches. Cattle trucks, goods yards, the smell of creosote on timber sleepers on a hot day....and so on. Green Dublin buses, green UTA buses.... UTA crests and flying snails on all things that moved, parcels being loaded and unloaded from elderly vans tagged onto the back of passenger trains, old wooden station bookstalls, whistles, the ding-ding and clanking of signal box levers.... ....and THAT is my modelling era! A 1922-based MGWR layout, mouthwatering though it might be, is just a bit too "previous" for someone of my vintage, though jhb171Senior would have loved it. And DD sets, Mk 2, 3 and 4 carriages, 201s and 071s....for ME......sorry..... too modern. Ten a penny. Listen all ye younger ones; and remember where ye heard it first. There will come a day, saith the Sage, when YOU will wax lyrical about the 40th anniversary of the good old Mk.4 carriages, Gawd rest 'em, and you will save for the €565 fare for the run to Greystones with the last surviving preserved ICR, repainted in its original silver and whatever it is. And you will look at the day's 300 miles per hour woodchip-powered 7000 class DMUs running on the train line from Dublin (Trainstation) to Belfast (Bus station) and think "why make a model out of THAT?". Now, to my friends here on this board of a certain vintage, back me up? I can't be the only one who dribbles at the sight of a silver "C" shunting cattle trucks, a filthy J15 with green six-wheelers, or an AEC set with two cars in UTA green and one still in blue and cream! And snoozes every time a 2600 goes to Cobh, and a 3000 goes to Londonderry / Derry / Stroke City / Derrylondon.
  9. It's great to see, now that the "black and tan" era is beginning to be well covered, the "grey, green and silver" era being taken on board properly.
  10. There's quite a lot available. There were some ex-GSWR six wheelers on it - Worsley do nice kits. Leslie's wagons are perfect, and the GNR cattle wagon would do. One GNR wooden coach still in brown ended up there. "C" class diesels, of course, too, and Bandon tanks and the J26 ex-Midland tank, for which there's also a kit. Corrugated wagons and wooden ones, H vans..... a Park Royal would suit as a railcar centre car (or a laminate) - would make the railcar set more realistic.
  11. The whole thing looks ever more like a committee-designed dog's dinner..... what a mess. Incidentally, anyone know if Fry's daughter is still alive?
  12. Brilliant, Nelson - we see far too few six wheelers on layouts and yet they were the majority of coaches surprisingly shorts times ago. What is the type of carriage you are modelling? Presumably BNCR (or BCDR?) given the straight sides?
  13. Looking very promising! What locos and rolling stock are planned? The carriages alone will be an interesting collection!
  14. Very well done.....tip...on wagons, chassis, wheels, couplings, etc., usually pretty heavily weathered. The body would always be less weathered than this. The roofs quite heavily weathered too... Great job!
  15. I was at that as a paying rubbernecker.....I think some of Fry's models were on display.
  16. All bilingual signs were post-1925. The GSR ones were black with white lettering, usually contained within a wooden or concrete framing and surround but sometimes screwed to dies of station buildings or signal cabins. The English-only one you mention, Phil, would be C & L origin possibly, but possibly also very early GSR. Most C & L were navy blue enamel with white letters, same as the MGWR, and obviously were English only. So, in terms of time scale, any time really. The line was opened in 1887 and closed in 1959. By the end, many GSR enamels were in place, but not all stations had them. I have an idea that Mohill had a bilingual sign too - if you are certain the photo you speak of was in the 50's - and beware the very frequent inaccuracy in dating old photos - then there was probably one pre-1925 C & L example and one GSR (obviously post-1925).
  17. The large bilingual black enamel signs with white lettering were a GSR product. None of the earlier companies had anything bilingual. On some lines, including obscure narrow gauge places like Schull, Ballydehob, Moyasta or Mohill, these new signs appeared very quickly (though Ballinamore had its original navy enamel C & L sign until the end). On other GSR lines, the standard GSR enamel type never appeared; Abbeyfeale had its old wooden WLWR sign right until after closure, having survived ownership by the GSR and CIE. Older wooden ones which did survive over the years, in GSR times and early CIE times were all painted black with letters and rims picked out in white. From the mid 1960s when the new plastic CIE ones appeared, with both languages in the same Roman font, older ones (like at Mallow above) were repainted with colours inverted, i.e. black on white instead of white on black. Old yellow UTA signs were still to be seen at Antrim, Ballymoney and Dunmurry Halt well into the 1980s. NIR had otherwise repainted all station signs - be they BCDR, NCC or GNR origin - I maroon with light grey lettering - same colours as their railcar livery of the day. (Incidentally, maroon with light grey, á la BR, not white or cream). Any that NIR made themselves in the late 60s and 70s were on narrower wooden boards painted maroon, with light grey lettering as before. Then they brought in those ghastly metal things which looked like old iron bedframes with letters welded on.... Is it me, or has design just gone, utterly gone, from any modern railway scene? Is there nothing at all with any sense of artistic merit or proportion in it?
  18. I've had my medication now, so I can continue.... The BCDR used a scheme of some sort of darkish olive green, which the DCDR has now appropriately adopted as its house style for stations. Like the GNR in many cases (but not all) it painted station signs in red on white, latterly anyway; though possibly black and white originally. The olive green was offset by off-white or cream, but station fencing was often, if not usually, painted a silvery-grey, which eye-witnesses liken to galvanised paint or lead paint as applied to water columns to prevent rust. jhb171Senior recalled this on wooden fencing at various locations on the system, which he covered in its entirety on several occasions (always on the footplate; on asking him what colour seating cushions were, some years ago, the answer: "Haven't a clue. was never IN a coach on the BCDR...."). The MGWR used pillar-box red and cream on stations. The GSWR probably used dark green and cream, though I can't be certain. The County Donegal used a rusty red colour - like the GNR's Western District, and a sandy beige, again like GNR Western District, but also light green. Until a few years ago at least, and possibly still, the badly faded remains may be seen on the former Castlefinn station building. The Clogher Valley, MGWR and WLWR often - but NOT always - used navy blue enamelled signs on stations, with the MGWR also using miniature versions on platform seat backs. No company ever used enamel on signal cabins, and no company ever called them "signal BOXES"; this is a trans-channel term. It is a shame that the new museum at Whitehead appears to have signage relating to signal "boxes".... While most railways simply had the station name on a cabin, thus "DOWNPATRICK" or "MALLOW", the MGWR was more long winded, thus: "MULLINGAR SIGNAL CABIN" or "MULTYFARNHAM SIGNAL CABIN". The level of realistic detail on model locos and rolling stock these days is often enhanced to a spookily realistic extent by weathering, and many here are as artistic as Leonardo himself when applying it. Da Vinci, that is, not De Caprio, or any bottle-tanned soccer player. Stations and so on are often neglected, so if accuracy is striven for in a model station, it is as well to remember that many stations in the past, especially on minor lines, might have seen the arrival of The Paintbrush as a major local event. Peeling and faded paint were a lot more prevalent than many a black and white photo would allow us to see. Thus, weathering of buildings (and tyres on cars in the car park!) is as good as obligatory to create an accurate image. I have no information, alas, on how the DSER painted their stations, despite living nowadays in DSER territory.......
  19. I'll delve and see what else I might have.....though many colour books will tell the story better than I! Couldn't agree more - old stations looked well, they were well proportioned, well designed and well laid out. Modern ones couldn't be more ugly - and large areas of concrete (the most unattractive building material in all humanity's nine million years of evolution) just becomes a canvas for the intellectually challenged scumbags who scrawl "artistic" graffiti all over them. No matter what era I would model, I would use a prototype station like Lisburn, Malahide, or Athy - not Adamstown & Cherrywood M7 Parkway Train Station Halt, for sure! Rant over, for now.....!
  20. Glenderg, I'm shocked at ye. Shocked to the pit of me stomach. The filth you do be readin' on that video thing ye have.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use