Jump to content

jhb171achill

Members
  • Posts

    14,089
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    320

Everything posted by jhb171achill

  1. True, junctionmad..... But, from the photos, am I right in thinking that the "rock armour" just seems to end at one point, and while all the coastline is intact and normal where protected, it's just disappeared where not protected?
  2. Well, on that basis, within one more year the ballast will be undermined. Cue a line closure of several years, and a financial bonanza for consultants. After that, they might consider carrying out some remedial works!
  3. That truly is a very impressive line up - and all within a year too! Dare we ask what's on the list for 2016!
  4. I agree entirely. One entire side needed for station; the Navan line to its right, the viaduct and cement branch to the left.
  5. On that basis, it might be worth making the station platforms a bit bigger, and the curves less sharp, even at the expense of moving the depot sidings out towards the Dublin direction even if that's not strictly prototypical. This would also leave too for a "Navan branch" to disappear behind the down platform, and possibly down to a lower level storage road, from where another line "up the hill" could join the main line further down as a cement factory line coming in.
  6. Probably have to be well scaled down. I would sketch out a scaled down version from photos of the actual, and see what that looks like or how it fits.
  7. Even if you had a track disappearing towards "Navan", trains could enter or leave the layout via this line, from perhaps a fiddle yard / siding on the level below the layout? Another possibility is an entrance to the cement factory siding on the other side of the station.
  8. Within just three or four years, almost all of the fatal railway accidents of the latter half of the 20th century! Apart from this one, Lisburn (Enterprise & 80 class) Hilden (80 class & 70 class) Cherryville Buttevant Rest in peace all victims.
  9. Only Mk 2s wore that "Galway" livery. Having applied it to the initial lot of stock to carry it, with the intention of it becoming possibly a general carriage livery, the powers-that-be didn't like it that much, and in any event as NIR found in the past, individual liveries for individual routes didn't really work, as carriages were used on all routes from time to time. Look, for example, at the incidences of "Enterprise" liveried locomotives in Galway, Ballina and Waterford in recent years, as elsewhere.
  10. Looks like a great set-up. The GNR main line is particularly interesting with ex-GNR stuff, CIE and UTA (or NIR). Navan branch Taras, Kingscourt gypsum would add to it...
  11. W O W factor !!!!!! Absolutely top class, so realistic. Captures that era perfectly, congratulations. I've emailed the RPSI to change the May tour to go through Kirley junction.....
  12. Ah! I'd forgotten about that, Kirley! :-) Your coaches do look fantastic in all respects...
  13. Yes, flange, I forgot about them, though I'm not quite sure they were originally like that.
  14. I don't know for certain, heustonconnolly, but I think Riversuir's answer is right.
  15. Let's hope the passenger numbers DO rise, and I agree, they probably will. But to seriously compete with road traffic, car or bus, something very major has to be done, and the question arises as to whether there is the political will, north or south, to achieve that. Certainly, while the UK has a Conservative government, don't expect too many more financial crumbs to be thrown to Stormont for public transport. Mind you, should such huge infrastructural work ever take place, it could be done in conjunction with a rail branch into Dublin airport.
  16. The seating inside, popeye, was 2+2, as it Cravens. Only the Park Royals had 3+2.
  17. Quick question, Kirley - I notice the late GSR-era / early CIE red upholstery inside, which was the norm in these coaches. Very impressive - did the kit come with details of this?
  18. Various replies above quite correctly make those points. The infrastructure, especially at the busy Dublin suburban end, is not up to the task of an hourly high speed train. The Cork line was quadrupled for some miles outside Dublin to accommodate up and down slow and fast lines. To do this from Connolly to Drogheda - necessary for reliable running as above - would entail knocking down half of north Dublin! The expense would be astronomical, and as others have said, and I confess to having ample experience of, there's a way cheaper half hourly bus. Bus Eireann / Ulsterbus on the hour, Aircoach (with excellent connections to southside city) on the half hour.
  19. NIR were keen to have them, Tony, but this was at a time when IE had other ideas! In particular, to store some, and keep the rest on specific links on the Cork line.
  20. While the long term future cannot be foretold, as of now, zero plans to anything with Mk 4's beyond the main line and occasionally Killarney.
  21. What would the oul monks on Skellig in the 5th century have made of it!
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use