Jump to content

Hidden Agenda Sulzers

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
I never heard of any major ongoing issues, hiddenagenda, but Inchicore crews hated B113/4 because the cabs were very cramped and unheated; I believe that at least initially the driver had no seat (!), and they were scared of them due to the brakes being prone to failure. The withdrawal of the last of the pair in 1972 was for brake failure on the way down to North Wall. 101s seemed to be well liked down south, where they did most of their running.[/quote

 

Dan Renehan published a series of articles on diesel locomotives from a drivers perspective in the IRRs Journal in the late 70s. The B101s were considered to be very good smooth riding locos the biggest drawback seems to have been a rather drafty and cold cab.

 

CIE seems to have looked at re-powering the locos with GM power plant at some stage but bought the 071s instead. Their earlyish withdrawl may have been more to do with CIE having more B Class locos than what was really needed and body corrosion than an underlying problem with the Sulzer prime mover and Metrovick electrical system.

Edited by Mayner
Posted

That's correct Mayner - they were indeed considering re-engining them. I knew someone involved at the time. Imagine a GM-engined B101 roaring down the Cork line! They would possibly still be with us instead of 071s....

Guest hidden-agenda
Posted

Good find G it shows the sorry state it was in prior to a decision being taken to do something with her.

Guest hidden-agenda
Posted

I cant say yes or no gents as the cad is gone with the guy who made the brass and he has gone and retired i believe.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use