Jump to content

StevieB

Members
  • Posts

    1,243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevieB

  1. My attempt at producing a GSWR ballast brake van. Getting there but more work is needed to get the verandah size right.
  2. At the risk of causing upset, box actually says Irish liveried version of the SR N class mogul. The could have given it the Irish classification of K1. Whether we’ll ever get a RTR U/K1a is anyone’s guess. Stephen
  3. The footbridge in the background is the finishing touch. Keep posting photos. Stephen
  4. I’m an old git as well and deplore the widespread use of ‘train’ instead of ‘railway’. Such is globalisation. Stephen
  5. StevieB

    J15 186

    Isn’t there scope for RPSI and DCDR working together so that the smaller RPSI locos unsuitable for modern day mainline working can find work on a heritage line? Stephen
  6. The obvious question to ask is why there appear to be different interpretations of the same regulations. I have also heard it said that another reason for not coming under cover has to do with the exhaust fumes from the diesel engines, eg Tralee and Kilkenny but not, apparently, Killarney! Stephen
  7. PM sent. Stephen
  8. Mouse Models produce brass overlays of the ex BCK version of the BGSV, if anyone is interested? Stephen Sorry, should have said Mousa Models. Stephen
  9. Silver Fox now produce a more than passable model of the original Park Royal railcars, replacing the original based on the Cravens dmu. Stephen
  10. If you are up for it, there is scope to lower the footbridge to a more realistic height by reducing the first flight of steps. That’s what I’m up to and the result is worthwhile. Stephen
  11. Impressive. Stephen
  12. Good customer service always goes a long way. Stephen
  13. Not really sure if I enjoyed it. I think James May’s attempt to lay 4mm track from Barnstaple to Bideford was better. At least you know he’s a bit off the wall when he tries to put together a full size kit of a spitfire in the same series some years ago! Stephen
  14. It seems that CIE were just like BR in that respect. Rather than standardising, they had a proliferation of designs over the years. So, the chassis under the bagged cement wagons was different again. Anyone got any plans or photos, please? Stephen
  15. Thanks for that. I assume that this was also the case re the chassis for the two varieties of bagged cement wagons. stephen
  16. Did CIE put the same chassis under the container flats, ballast wagons and cement bubbles that have been produced in model form by Provincial Wagons and IRM? And is it the same chassis under the magnesite wagons produced by IFM? And is the chassis for the Dapol prestwin the same, similar or nothing like? Stephen
  17. PM sent. Stephen
  18. Good as it is, the Bill Bedford is overlay is inaccurate in that the double doors next to the guard’s door should be closer to that door by one door’s width. If you look at the BCK next to the overlay, you’ll see what I mean. The blank door of the pair is where the 1st class passenger door was. The RPSI BGSV has lost this blank door during the recent renovation. Hope that all makes sense. Stephen
  19. Of the 49 members of the combined class, I have identied the livery carried by 34 of them in the mid 1970’s but this includes only 181 (B&T) that Murphy’s produced. So it’s basically two questions: Were 141, 165 and 188 still in B&T in the mid 1970’s? Had 142, 161, 182 and 190 been repainted in ST by the mid 1970’s? Stephen
  20. The 1970’s, the period I am modelling, were a time of great change on the railways in Ireland, not least regarding liveries, when it was out with Black and Tan and in with Supertrain. Murphy Models produced 141, 165, 181 and 188 in B&T together with 142, 161, 182 and 192 in ST. However, my trawls through photos of that period have shown that only 181 carries the correct for the period. Anybody have details of the other seven or do I need to do wholesale renumbering? Stephem
  21. I’m surprised no-one has commented on this little gem http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/128582-irish-rail-plans-bi-mode-train-order-for-dart-expansion/. Not always well thought of in the UK, since it is very often associated with the cancellation of electrification plans. It does, however, allow trains a longer run than on a single mode of power. Stephen
  22. MM077 and MM078 now sold. I shall be listing some 141’s, 181’s, Cravens and mk2d’s, all in IR/IE liveries in the New Year, to see if anyone has any money left after all those visits to IRM Towers. Steph3n
  23. Beware the diameter of the turntable, since most of them out in the sticks would be approx 45', the maximum length of the locos used on those lines. Stephen
  24. Haven’t we been here before
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use