Jump to content

StevieB

Members
  • Posts

    1,243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevieB

  1. Presumably adjacent to the remains of the old loco shed. Stephen
  2. From the state of the track, looks like the weedspraying train is due. Stephen
  3. Was that top of their list for ones found unsold or returned? As far as I know they have not produced any more. Stephen
  4. I thought that they had sold out. I know that Leslie of Provincial Wagons has been trying to get a rerun of the UG, so what’s your secret? Stephen
  5. You have to wonder how hard IE management tried to retain the business, or were there too many EU obstacles in the way?The one size fits all approach can have serious drawbacks for small countries like Ireland, or am I being too political? Stephen
  6. I wonder if MRJ would be interested in featuring this finescale model railway. The overall effect is quite outstanding. Stephen
  7. Somebody must have answered your prayers. Stephen
  8. Look forward to that. Stephen
  9. I assume Jim Meade is David Franks’ successor as CEO of IE. Where’s he from? Stephen
  10. The link in the email worked ok for me. Apparently you can order container flats, only you can’t yet. Otherwise, keep up the good work. Stephen
  11. The real Shannon had an interesting history. It was part of an order of six locos ordered by the WLWR from Kitsons. The first three had round topped boilers and were delivered towards the end of the 19th century. The fourth was Shannon, which was the first standard gauge loco in Ireland to have a belpaire boiler and arrived early in the 20th century.. There were meant to be two more similar locos but the GSWR was in the process of taking over the WLWR and there was a dispute over paying for them. As a result they were sold to the MGWR. After the 1925 grouping the former WLWR locos became class J25 while the former MGWR locos became class J19. Subsequent rebuilding saw the belpaire boilers replaced by round topped ones. Stephen
  12. David You're a very lucky man to have acquired Shannon - lovely model. Stephen
  13. I think you’ll be very lucky indeed if anyone is willing to part with one, even for a shedload of money. You’d have more luck giving leslie10646 your name for a possible re-run of the RTR model. Stephen
  14. Noel Where did you get the sprung Keen suspended gangways? They certainly seem to do the job of closing the gap between coupled coaches. Stephen
  15. Flange lubricator’s reference to non stop trials in 1965 between Dublin and Cork reminds me of a fact that most people seem unable to grasp - it’s not how fast you go, it’s how slow you go ie the number of speed restrictions and stops govern the overall journey time. I know that IE recently conducted some high speed trials between Dublin and Cork but did they lead to anything? CIE, and BR, seem more interested in running what used to be called semi fast trains. Stephen
  16. Good move that short length of straight in between two curves going in the opposite directions. I read about doing that in one of Model Railroader’s layout planning supplements many years ago. Stephen
  17. Zuron make a good tool for just such a job. It comes in the form of a pair of pliers - lovely, clean cut followed by a few strokes of a fine file to tidy up the end. Stephen
  18. Looking good. Stephen
  19. Brilliant. Stephen
  20. What will be nice for fans of OVS Bulleid’s work is to be able to compare the turf burner alongside his SR main line diesel 1-Co-Co-1 courtesy of Kernow Models. Stephen
  21. What was the diameter of the round buffers they were originally supplied with? Stephen
  22. Looking at the Kadee website, they do a range where the coupling head is fitted at different levels relative to the shank which attaches to the wagon body. They’re not NEM though. Stephen
  23. Fran Thanks for that. Stephen
  24. Have I seen somewhere that, because the NEM box is placed higher on the chassis than normal to allow all the lovely detail to show, the recommended way of fitting Kadee is to glue them to the underside of the NEM box? Do Kadee not do cranked versions of the coupling to deal with this? My trials to date indicate that the no 18 is the right one to use reduce the distance between wagons to a manageable amount. Does anyone else agree with this? Stephen
  25. Sorry Noel, I wasn’t trying to hijack hour workbench with the last post. Stephen
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use