Jump to content

jhb171achill

Members
  • Posts

    14,515
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    341

Everything posted by jhb171achill

  1. Not the greatest original pic to work with, but the pic shows then-newish laminates with a green “A” + stripe. Unusually, coaches 2, 3 & (out of view) 4 are the same type, so this is possibly a special train intended to impress someone..... Recent comments elsewhere about accurate weathering may be interested in where the oil stains were on these Crossley beasts. Additional comments - now that I see this pic in a larger screen, the carriages carry the name boards used on the principal expresses, which I think dates it to the early 60s. As this train passes, Inchicore Works is probably performing its Unboxing Dance with brand new 121s, ready-fitted with kadees, 21mm gauge axles and sound chips.
  2. Dunno what they did IN the factory all year (played cards & drank tea?), but in terms of railway traffic, nothing. Trucks all parked up, and until the mid 1970s used for general goods elsewhere.
  3. That would be right, Angus! Looking forward to seeing the result.... An ex-GSWR loco might have: G S W R number INCHICORE WORKS 1884 ....while an ex-MGWR loco would typically be: G S R number (just)!
  4. Yes, you're right - most with a grey background (which, strangely, the manufacturer doesn't do) - but only because most engines were grey right until almost the end. By the time they started painting any engines black or green, the numberplates were replaced by painted numbers, so that with the exception of the 800 class, grey is the only show in town for numberplates - with only a very few exceptions which (a) kept numberplates into the late 50s, AND got painted black. The wording "Inchicore Works" and the build date varied from engine to engine after the amalgamation, though all GSWR locos had both. An ex-DSER, Midland, West Cork or narrow gauge engine might have "G S R" (and a handful had "C I E" later, but it varied. Colours: If the loco is grey, the numberplate is grey. Black or red backed numberplates on grey locos are simply as wrong as lime green CIE roundels. But, of course, a few exceptions! This one, "A few had the backgrounds painted black with the lettering and borders picked in red...." is not at all certain, and if there is any substance in it would certainly not have been in late GSR or CIE times - possibly early GSR (late 20s). 1. The 800 class. Initially, all three had dark blue backgrounds, uniquely. No. 800 retained these always. Nos 801 and 802 - again, uniquely - had theirs repainted red background sometime in the early 50s, and retained these to the end. 2. Ex-MGWR "E" / J26 No. 560. This engine appears to have been painted black in the late 50s, but kept its cast numberplates. However, in the early 1990s I owned one of its numberplates (wish I had kept it) and whoever the previous owner was, had scrubbed it back to the grey paint. There were a very small number of other locos like this, but once an engine was repainted by CIE, off went the plates. 3. CIE repaints. Between 1945 and 1962, CIE repainted some engines green: numberplates ALL removed, except the 800s, in place of light green painted numbers. Some grey: numberplates replaced by light yellow painted numbers. Some black: ditto - yellow painted numerals. So there is a fundamental error in a number of manufactured plates I've seen, in that the backgrounds are BLACK; this incorrect - if the loco still has a numberplate, it means it's still in GSR guise, thus grey ONLY. The raised edges and numbers on cast plates was normally outlined in pale yellow, but occasionally just painted over plain grey, sometimes *(as Senior observed) polished bare metal (which would have just got filthy!) and possibly (unconfirmed) other variations. However, if you want a red-backed plate, or a black-backed one, you're way back into GSWR times. Up to about 1900, when GSWR locos were green, numberplates were black-backed, and between then and about 1915, when GSWR locos were lined black, they were red. Perhaps the manufacturer might do them grey? Black or red would only be of use to GSWR modellers.
  5. In response to a question, the stock in the train above is typical of the period; this train containing green laminates, a Park Royal, and (out of sight) at least one Bredin, more laminates of several types and what looked like a dirty silver tin van at the rear. I focussed in on the loco, as I will in the coming days. Today's picture, sticking with the "A" class, this at Mallow. The light green paint on the line along the side, and the "snail", have worn off - many photos show this line weathering badly, even when the main body colour was still smart enough. Mail van attached, still in "silver". Modeller's details: Water column on left, still very dirty / weathered green. Note the roof of the TPO. It looks black. It is important to note that like domes on blue GNR engines, or red Donegal engines, although these often LOOKED black, this was 100% dirt, and in all three cases were NEVER actually painted black. Similarly, silver coaching stock and locos never had black bogies - always also silver - but covered in gunge, gunk, oil and brake dust. Silver (unpainted) stock, despite being new, would on occasion still be steam hauled. Good luck with a clean roof on that one! This pic is the Kerry mail, so it will have about three passenger-carrying coaches behind it, plus one or two - or being a mail train maybe more - tin vans. More tomorrow.
  6. From the P Dillon / C Fry collection, I’ve fished out a few guess which I’ll post over the coming days to illustrate the “A” (and, for good measure, the B101s) in the 1958-64 period. I do jig have to hand exact dates for each individual one. These are cropped to show maximum detail on the loco and what “goes with them”. I hope this is of interest. Firstly; A7. The copyright for ALL of these that I will post in the coming days belongs to Hassard Stacpoole or Patricia Dillon.
  7. Indeed - not great. The grey one has the “wrong dirt in the wrong places”, perhaps; are these things “factory-done”? In real life, with a livery as impractical as pale grey and yellow for a locomotive (and initially still surrounded by steam engines!), this livery got filthy quickly.
  8. No idea - probably the same reason but maybe different locations.
  9. Yes, they were - only a few cars (for all I'm aware maybe only one) got them. And it did run in West Cork on some occasions, as I've seem pics of it at Bantry and Albert Quay. However in the above pic, that's a shadow of telegraph wires - you'll see it goes right along the roof. Roofs were normally black. Yes, arrival 2.30pm in Cork. Tail lamp on railcar. The AEC cars were given a trial on the Valentina branch (though never used there). They needed the wider buffers for sharp curves. Some bogie coaches were fitted with them too.
  10. A guy I met in a pub told me............
  11. It will indeed, Robert - many congratulations!
  12. Those look like tar tankers. No wonder the Park Royal Guinness tasted like antelope poo.
  13. Bet you'd rather have an AEC set drifting down into Bantry!
  14. It’s because the box is still with it....
  15. That’s of big interest to me with a small South African shunting layout in progress.....
  16. Did they clean the novichok off the seat?
  17. Maybe it’s the pills I’m on, or advancing senile bewilderment, but even I would be tempted to buy one of those silver pipes on wheels, as a curio to remind me of regular travel between Galway and Dublin in recent years. But it would have to have a working model of the tea trolley, its Eastern European staff, and REAL kitkats.
  18. Rather than grain wagons....? I think some of those opens with the curved tops to the ends were still kicking about in the 1930s, and possibly longer - you'd never know what you'd find hiding long forgotten in some nook or cranny siding in West Cork.
  19. That is precisely the reason. Once they were in use, daily grime became the livery. All railway companies had their own “corporate image”, just like today. Manufacturers often dolled things up to look good in photos (e.g. locomotives with elaborately lined “works grey”), but these were not the way they went into traffic, as companies wanted them in their standard colours. Painters wages were cheap! The first-ever “Woolwich” was repainted in full twice before it ever turned a wheel.....
  20. While my personal knowledge is almost non-existent of these coloured pipes that run along railways in England, I am well aware that they've a following - and will do even more in the future, I would guess. Surely it's not beyond the wit of man to do a basic bodyshell, or possibly a suitable profiled end that could be stuck onto a British one as a replacement end to the correct profile? We can make a very good conversion of a steam engine from one type to another completely different prototype by changing the cab and side tanks........
  21. Maybe they're not high enough in the Pekking order for the magazine to spel corecktly?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use