Jump to content

DiveController

Members
  • Posts

    3,987
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by DiveController

  1. I'd agree with Noel and would bring it to the front of the layout but starting just to the right go the LC and joining just to the right of the branch line with a curved point. Double track LCs on the branch lines (main line in your layout) seemed less common than doubles. The SC, Fuel, Oil depot would move slightly forward. Incidentally, your storage loops could be much longer if they started off the right hand back curve rather than confined to the 'back straight'
  2. It's not perfect. Mine needs a touch up and the weathering is not on guru level but I like it and it easily passes the 2 foot rule
  3. Trans-Siberian Egress as you leave Courtmac. Looking forward to it, Andy
  4. If you're producing all three I'll take at least one of each, probably more. Will edit post when home tonight. Any chance of the buffer/kitchen coach? Are full width/length coaches still on the schedule when time allows?
  5. Chuckled when I saw the sign, Code for ..., indeed:ROFL:
  6. Is this the one? http://home.btconnect.com/Enhance-Ecosse/ccastle.html
  7. Cripes! 6 stone of Millenium Falcon suspended using only the force. And she's already at light speed!
  8. True, maybe John Haskins who wanted the steam train operator fined for delaying him will take up the issue of ICR stock with IE.... (hand still to ear, no sound) ..... maybe the Twit-er server is down
  9. I thought it looked like a 4w sorting van conversion. great photos, Richie, very informative. Knew very little about these before this thread Yes, agree with jb, nice layout! Yes, 4w sorting van/TPO 2971 would be correct
  10. Yes, flange, very much so. I knew there was a shot of a 1429- somewhere floating about. Thanks for that. I'd be really interested to see a photo of one of the other composites or 13xx standards if they exist
  11. Excellent, GSV. Just what I wanted to know. Superb information and thank you!
  12. Looks well, Gerry. I suppose some of the steam age stuff persisted for a long time afterwards some may not everything would need to be changed out to be prototypical
  13. Was brown/bauxite the standard in the 1970s or for fitted vans only when the were retrofitted with brakes?
  14. If anyone has any photos to post or refer to, would you please post? I think we've come full circle since post #1:)
  15. Wasn't disagreeing with that, just saying some of us might not model our trains with sufficient variety at times. THese old clips are great for demonstrating what ran together in those times. Love that video. That train also has a 4w heating van with space for 3T of luggage AND two luggage vans!
  16. I'm glad you confirmed that as I could not see the fairly distinctive features of the Park Royals (granted, it's not a great photo). Would most of the composites and standards turned out in that post-1955 era at Inchicore have been turned out in silver. Mostly I have seen these in photos in green That makes perfect sense now given the typo in the book
  17. Indeed, it seems so outlandish that one would probably not run that as a model
  18. John, sorry I missed your post above. Thanks for that.
  19. That's a great shot in Supertrain. Many looked like this in the late 60s prior to re-engining. Incidentally an example of the ETH that was discussed above on the buffer beam. Have to agree and be grateful that someone had to foresight to see them preserved. Again, from Brian Flanigan
  20. NIiiiicccee, John. That interior is fantastic. No change of you doing a resin mould of that interior to go with your coaches, I suppose? Superb job! You should try lighting the coach with an LED strip, would really show off the detail
  21. On the baby GMs the MU connection seemed to be a simple affair with a single cable between locomotives (all by the same manufacturer of course). I saw the MU working you referred to with the Black & yellow B233 in multiple with a 181. It had not occurred to me that such MUs occurred, over 2000hp with the more powerful 201 in charge. There must be at least 4 hoses on the 201s bufferbeams, possibly one for GMs, AECs etc, (hence my confusion regarding their purpose)? When re-engined they would have been almost as strong an an A class had been, and much better equipped for heavy freight then when originally put into traffic
  22. One peculiarity for modellers of the C class is that 206 was the first to receive its GM engine in 1969 and B206 was repainted with the waist level band rather than the low band in all other B201s when re-engined (233 and 234 which had been re-engined earlier with Maybach engines, of course) I'd definitely like to see a photo of that if the member or anyone has one
  23. Looking good. Thanks for posting
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use