Jump to content
  • 0

Ammonia wagons

Rate this question


WRENNEIRE

Question

10 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 1

Fauvet Girel was the company, Dave. Leased to CIE by UK wagon leasing company, STS. Was some strange maintenance split on these wagons where CIE maintained the running gear and underframe but tank was maintained by Fauvet Girel I think.

Edited by iarnrod
Extra details
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

DJD

https://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/eurlammonia/h1fbb377f#he70e226d

https://paulbartlett.zenfolio.com/eurlammonia/h1fbb377f#he70e226c

gives a link to two pics the UK version. 

Yonks ago LIma did a tanker but was , I guess, an HO model - but given how big the tank is it might be ok. 

http://newweb.ngaugesociety.com/wp-content/uploads/Journal-6-16-Bashing-Chemical-Wagons.pdf

Is a link to Grahames excellent bashing and the wagon gets a conversion from a Farish  TEA wagon which Bachmann do in 00 eg. https://www.oliviastrains.com/trains/mt/bachmann-wagons/bachmann-tank-wagons/bachmann-38-110-tea

That a quick search , hope it helps.

Robert 

I should add , cheekily of course ! That having got 6 into gloss white and hoping to use MIR transfers after some green on solebars  on some MIR resin tanks - you need a Murphy 201 to pull as very heavy. I would expect the good gents in the IRM palace to be sorting the packaging designs this week ! ....

Robert  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1

I was told that part of the reason the Ammonia's are or were not on their short term radar was because of the lack of details they have to model the underbody of the wagons. They don't want to do a Hornby job with a blank barren underside and at the same time they don't want to make up an educated guess at the detail and model it either. That may all have changed but that was the case I was told, it's that they want to do it right or not at all.

My view is, if they do make a guess at the underbody and no one has any info to help then no one can correct them or critique the model if and when it's released.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1
1 hour ago, Railer said:

I was told that part of the reason the Ammonia's are or were not on their short term radar was because of the lack of details they have to model the underbody of the wagons. They don't want to do a Hornby job with a blank barren underside and at the same time they don't want to make up an educated guess at the detail and model it either. That may all have changed but that was the case I was told, it's that they want to do it right or not at all.

My view is, if they do make a guess at the underbody and no one has any info to help then no one can correct them or critique the model if and when it's released.

But as I have found on other projects that once a model is produced a zillion photographs suddenly appear to disprove and sometimes support  the work done. The class 22 books for instance produced after Dapol developed the model and even requested assistance these books gave new insights, and allowed much frothing and bashing ... manufacturers  are thus very wary of guesstimates.  Quite a few underframe pics as a result of accidents so really we are lucky there are no photos of these tanks upside down. 

Robert         

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use