Jump to content

DiveController

Members
  • Posts

    3,989
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by DiveController

  1. It's late here, Noel but since no-one has been on as yet, I know that Mayner usually recommends the the etches are fitted to the side of the donor with only the space between the window themselves removed, with the top an bottom left in place to fit to the chassis and roof. He suggests gluing the roof for stability and have the entire thing removable from the chassis. His are designed for a Dapol kit which is a scale 60' which is not the usual 61'6" frame standard on almost all of CIEs 1950s built stock except the very first few composites. Scale 60' coaches required, I think. The tumblehome would be whatever is on the donor coach. NZ will be awake shortly I'm sure
  2. Full power, Tony, balls to the wall!
  3. What could be more entertaining that an exhibition of the quintessential irish railway ... and you don't have to entertain in the Kingdom both days surely?
  4. FCUK'd by another online site. I was wondering where the original BUT car photos had gone to the other night. In discussion before we highlighted the option of "storing a local copy" which you can click on when uploading so it is actually stored on the IRM site servers. Many threads have had their photos disappear when the original folders are rearranged or renamed online even when the host doesn't disappear. I expect the motivation for Dropbox was to get rid of high volume data types to allow it to continue to offer services without having to host huge data volumes associated with photos. A terrible shame but nothing you can do at this point
  5. I know you expressed some reservations about the size when you were planning. I suppose some prefer to run trains and personally I prefer to do that. Obviously you also like to model as evidenced by the high quality of the layout and associated structures so far. If you move to N, you'll certainly fit more in and have room to do more shunting but will you be happy with that another end-end on a smaller scale in the same space? Can the OO gauge layout be extended to create a circuit with helices (maybe impossible in the space still?) or round the room at some arbitrary level that might pass over the furniture allow the room to continue to function? Summer house? Well insulated outside shed, although watch the damp? It a lovely layout and maybe a break from the intense pace will help. I think of mine as a ten year project (more than two years on this site and I have nothing to show for it)!
  6. Jeepers, any photos of these anywhere?
  7. As you know neither really resembles the broad 5'3" gauge since its 16 mm between the rails but the height of the Code 100 rail is oversized. The code 75 appears more to scale and 75/1000" would equate to just over 6" for the prototype (if I've done my maths correctly). Does that sound right for the height of the prototypical rail?
  8. Really like those, Kieran. Superb job!
  9. Double scores, convincing win
  10. It's probably just a clogged rod in need of maintenance. Maintenance always better done before they have to jumpstart you with a 300A decoder. Get well soon!
  11. HI John, I'll commit to one of these and work on skills to build it in the meantime!
  12. Looks completely prototypical, what's the problem again?
  13. Is it possible it's just out of gauge and can be corrected with a back to back, or should it be the middle axle on the bogie, maybe reassembled incorrectly after servicing the loco?
  14. He closed the store on Christmas Eve 2016 but the website is still up and running. He hasn't declared whether or not he plans continue to sell on line but may be selling off the existing stock. Anything that has sold out does not seem to have come back into stock
  15. I think you're right, Richie. I couldn't find a photo of the 3213-3218 series GSV (1978). This seems to be 3216TL and they were built from earlier coaches, likely the 2130-2136 series composites CIE built 'laminate' stock. These were the first composites to be built on the longer 61'6" chassis whereas the 2124-2129 were on the earlier 60' chassis. However, I'm not certain of that. The vans apparently ran on GSR bogies and were only 9'6" wide so it's possible they were converted from something even older although I don't know if anything prior to that had a 61'6" chassis. If anyone has any info on this, I'd be interested to hear. Many thanks for that photo, Richie!
  16. I have neglected to renumber, repaint or weather mine (yet) but they would not look grossly out of place mixed in with some of Leslie's wagons either
  17. It's a bit grainy but a TPO would be the most likely (although it looked like it may have some exhaust equipment on the roof).
  18. Shush! .....(please, no:praying:)
  19. Some of the cravens had a guards compartment fitted with a vacuum brake gauge which could also be used for this purpose and had a Train Line Brake (TLB)
  20. Some nice coverage of the magnesite wagons flows which ended in 1982 on this IRRS video. Some other interests might be the fuel oil wagons and 1950s built CIE coaches
  21. There is a plethora of them about at the moment. I'm thinking of selling some of my stuff!
  22. That's superb. I did ask them for a UG (fingers crossed)
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use