Noel

Superb edit and audio mix

As Miley might say "Well holy God, merciful hour, jeepers that is well just desperately incredible, tis it."

Enjoy

Sorry @amdaley, posts crossed. Insane. That must be a record €450. Fortunately I've never had to pay more than €118 for a baby GM. https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Murphy-Models-141-class-loco-156-IR-Irish-Rail-livery-ex-CIE-DCC-fitted/114265029224?_trkparms=aid%3D1110001%26algo%3DSPLICE.SIM%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D225114%26meid%3D9cd115c38ce74bf08cbc450f791f86e6%26pid%3D100005%26rk%3D1%26rkt%3D12%26mehot%3Dpf%26sd%3D233631919808%26itm%3D114265029224%26pmt%3D0%26noa%3D1%26pg%3D2047675&_trksid=p2047675.c100005.m1851

Foam underlay complete at last. I've gone for double layer for sound insulation, the entire baseboard is covered in a layer of 3mm closed cell dense foam (self adhesive backing), and then a second layer of track bed under track work (ie 3mm closed cell dense self adhesive foam). Lots of awkward transposing of track plan using a roll of grease proof paper and tippex to mark the base layer of foam so that the second layer can be correctly positioned where the track will go. I cannot cut the upper layer of foam in place for fear of cutting through the base layer which would just allow PVA glue seep through to the play base and create a sound bridge. My reason for the double layer is to prevent PVA/ballast mix coming into contact with the plywood baseboard. I've seen foam act as a great track sound insulator until it is ballasted when the PVA at the edges of the track bed hardens when dry amplifying track noise (ie effectively connecting the track with the baseboard). Cobalt point motor holes drilled before putting the foam down and transposed one layer at a time. The double layer self adhesive foam has been workable so far Next up is relay the track once again for a dry fit to check alignment and loading gauge clearances with platforms, point motor holes, etc and then remove to do the dirty scenic landscaping, or mask the track while doing the plaster work. Hope it works when running my toy choo-choos.

As far as I know Brendan is modelling away, hadn't gone anywhere, just no longer active on here. He also had a giant scale 121 model as a static display and a millennium falcon. His Heuston station building was a supreme master piece of architectural model engineering and artistry. An exceptionally talented fellow and a really decent and kind man too.

That's impressive. If I remember correctly a forumite on here built a large scale model of Heuston Station about 4 years ago as a commission, and it was photo realistic. It included the detailed front and fascade of the building with all its architectural details. There are pics of it somewhere here on the forum.

Yes agree with you, the current prices on eBay for 141/181 these past six months had been around €190, but only a few years ago €100-€140 was more the norm. Fortunately I picked up some a few years ago before the current price spike. As these locos were produced by Bachmann for MM I don't see a re-run happening anytime soon, unless another company decided to partner with MM and do a refreshed version of the 141/181s. To this day the 141/181s are my favourite locos of all time and their diminutive size really suits typical sized layouts. They can operate singly or in pairs.

@Railer Just bad luck I guess. I've never had probs like that with the MM mk2, my only dissatisfaction was the incorrect NEM pocket locations requiring surgery to use Kadee couplings properly. They did not seem quite on the same stratospheric quality level as the hyper detailed MM craven coaches, but they seem pretty nice coaches. Weathering helps deal with the yellow shade of orange that was used. I bought a rake last year from Marks models (ie the later corrected batch) and happy to report none of the painting issues in the first seemed evident. Never had any part of the sub chassis fall off. A bit modern for my preferred era but would love to see IRM/AS do Irish Mk3 coaches including the push pull sets.

Does it come with an Eoin to help build it?

The murphy models chip. As to EMD 645 or EMD 567 variants, It depends on what livery loco you buy. Most ears cannot tell the difference anyway. 645 would be more recent liveries such as IE/IR Tippex, 567 would be grey and black and tan liveries, supertrain could be either.

I've quite a bit of old 1970s Lima stuff like that, but (avert your eyes @WRENNEIRE) I threw all the boxes out long ago. I don't run it anymore. They did make nice mk3 coaches.

I use kadee couplings because I run older era stock requiring shunting which magnetic couplings don't suit, but look an interesting option for fixed rakes of modern era stock.

I got my LokProgrammer from https://www.modellbahnshop-lippe.com for €135 plus €3 postage. I buy all my decoders from there also Lenz + ESU (ie for better price). LokProgrammer will only work with ESU decoders. However you may not need a LokProgrammer as you may be able to adjust some CV settings using your DCC controllers test track outputs. Blank LokSound V5 decoders are €95 from MBL. If you are prepared to go through the learning curve, you can make your own diesel loco DCC sound projects, or far quicker make small changes to existing projects. ESU publish a large range of sound projects including for Murphy Model 071 locos and 201 locos. I got baby GM LokSound decoders for my 141/181/121 locos from http://www.wheeltappersdccsounds.co.uk. Its relatively easy to do things like add Irish loco horns to a USA loco project. WheelTappers made up custom 121 decoders for me with additional features including 3 types of rail clank/flange squeal, distant horns, cascading buffer clash simulating a loose coupled train stopping, cascading coupling snatch simulating a loose coupled train starting off, etc. Personally what was really important was the driving characteristics such as coasting, braking over realistic distances, slow acceleration and notching/trashing simulating a heavy train starting off. No use having an ultra scale looking model if it behaves in an unprototypical manner like a scalextric toy accelerating faster than a Tesla Model S PS: If rolling your own, don't forget the added complexity of configuring lights and light mappings.

Wow this is absolutely fantastic to see

Yes I was not happy, the tip of the iron was one of those beveled types more suited to pcb and awkward to get in and out quickly without heating the plastic. I prefer a flat tip. Tedious but got all the Gort ones done today using thinner feed wires. Next time on Kingsbridge I'll use thin wire as bridges and separate track feeds. 7 done, 70 more to do!

Modifying the electro frog points this afternoon as per recommendations for frog switching, etc. Messy, I need thiner wire.

Black'n'Tan Heaven. Kings bridge shed.

@warb,Fab video of an incredible layout. Words not adequate to describe Do you have a track plan graphic?

Superb layout scenes

Looking forward to loading gauge trials next week before ballasting Chugging away slowly

The location doesn't look like it will impact the existing car park at all. Looks like the building will be energy efficient being fully powered by Solar PV from the roof (and presumably storage batteries). Looks like over 60kw capability.

Shame 201s ended up rotting to rust in sidings at inchicore and the mk3's got scraped 10 years prematurely. But that's public spending and it seems the same all over the developed world - wasteful. Nothing compared to the waste in US defence budget. Now we are left with the hideously boring toy tram 22k yo-yos. But good to see a new central traffic management system. Had Tesla designed the new system, it may have been on a single 10ft touchscreen LCD display mounted in a giant electric RV parked at the end of the existing car park, with two operators monitoring the autonomous train driving and signalling systems.

Is it operating now?

Cheers. That's the general idea. But 121, and A classes and 101 Sulzers were also visitors from Limerick and Ennis on route to Athenry, Tuam and Claremorris.