Jump to content

Alan's Workbench

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Posted
56 minutes ago, Patrick Davey said:

Another masterpiece in the making Alan!  Hopefully she will make a visit to Brookhall Mill in the near future!

If she does, only one piece of music will do ….

 

  • Funny 2
Posted
33 minutes ago, Galteemore said:

Well done Alan. The Beyer smokebox is a thing of beauty but not easy to replicate, with those subtle curve reversals. Looks great. 

No built-up smokebox (or round-top firebox) is easy to roll, as you're doing a standard roll and then having to change direction. Pain in the neck, even with a rolling mill.

  • Agree 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, Horsetan said:

No built-up smokebox (or round-top firebox) is easy to roll, as you're doing a standard roll and then having to change direction. Pain in the neck, even with a rolling mill.

Yep. Been there done that got the burnt fingers…..

IMG_0340.jpeg

  • Like 7
  • WOW! 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Tullygrainey said:

Some pretty sharp curves there David! Nice bit of riveting.

Thanks Alan. Beyer tanks are like that as you know. Simple squares at the back - horrendous curves at the front!! 

  • Funny 1
Posted

Neat.

VERY neat!

 As another member of the 'Smokeboxes are a real bummer Club' can only concur with the challenges involved, so hopefully a couple of glasses of falling down water have been awarded. Plus it is nearly Christmas after all.

  • Like 2
  • Funny 2
Posted

I've been warned that cataract operations will be happening in the future, if I last as far as them being bad enough to justify it.

I'm not looking forward to someone fiddling with such delicate bits...


I'm inclined to wait until you have some spare time coming up.

  • Agree 1
  • Funny 2
Posted

Back to No.6's tender.

Taking a leaf from @Mayner's book (thank you John), I attacked the tender chassis again and fitted patches inside the frames to give it two sprung axles riding in slots. Bit of a dog's dinner by the time I'd finished hacking it around but it works and it won't be seen. 

IMG_1587.thumb.jpeg.7d7f8c188affd6758368323f8c06415e.jpeg

 

Tender frames cut and shaped as a pair before being separated...

IMG_1589.thumb.jpeg.1abe5ce97299cf96be77dc059d8c4777.jpeg

 

...then a role for my new toy, a GW Models Universal Rivet Tool. A lovely bit of kit and quite addictive.

IMG_1590.thumb.jpeg.d16070aafa2faba1376cc5bf378c8b60.jpeg

IMG_1591.thumb.jpeg.056e6b780f7419a25bb40a0e3698962b.jpeg

IMG_1592.thumb.jpeg.d323de155f9396e7812c8e6a30eb4140.jpeg

 

Tender body sides cut and shaped as a pair then separated for another riveting performance.

IMG_1595.thumb.jpeg.4f08f4e269a83472d1734d660dca5c96.jpeg

 

I made a mess of the second one -  that diagonal line of rivets strayed off line and trying to fix it only made things worse. I had to cut another side and start again.

IMG_1608.thumb.jpeg.24886898d428cc139cfc1c5fbd329ee3.jpeg

 

Eventually got a matching pair. The beading along the top edge is 0.33mm brass rod.

IMG_1598.thumb.jpeg.1e08783edf84740f7b3512a47b231e73.jpeg

 

I thought this tender would be fairly straightforward to assemble but the more I look at it the more complicated it becomes. More soon.

Alan

  • Like 12
  • WOW! 3
Posted

Great persistence and a lovely result with that rivetting tool. Looks much better than the NWSL version I bought 20 years ago and struggled with.

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Gets a wow from me because know how difficult it can be to produce a line of straight rivets. Have you tried scoring a fine line on the reverse? You can then use it to help alignment - though the clamps and wheels take most of the strain out of things. Rivet transfers are ok, but the GW press is very addictive!

  • Agree 1
  • Informative 1
Posted

Riveting done, the tender is now largely assembled. A lot of edge to edge soldering at the corners which is always fun 😱.

IMG_1599.thumb.jpeg.d6b754ce38f6b20ceb883b2619938fe0.jpeg

 

Keeping the solder away from all my lovingly embossed rivets was a challenge.

IMG_1602.thumb.jpeg.59652f6cc8eee006c467bbfdb31584b8.jpeg

IMG_1616.thumb.jpeg.dc0cb4fe74f6966800c11e0c6f9f73b0.jpeg

 

Complicated little beast. Still a few details to add. I've built it almost entirely in nickel silver. 

IMG_1626.thumb.jpeg.a3edda10ab50b9e210aa6cd934ad6164.jpeg

 

The springs were cobbled together using white metal wagon spring castings from MJT (Dart Castings), cut down and soldered to brass rod with low melt solder. I vaporised one and broke another before I got 6 usable ones. 

IMG_1612.thumb.jpeg.03962901167dca2c2afeb433c6306f61.jpeg

IMG_1614.thumb.jpeg.b8402c36880ee57337824101308cc3b0.jpeg

 

They'll go on like this but won't be finally attached until the paint and lining is done. Axle boxes are also MJT castings. Undoubtedly not accurate but they'll do until something better turns up. If ever.

IMG_1623.thumb.jpeg.b4665547f4fc27e0df4f0ac925ca1fcb.jpeg

IMG_1636.thumb.jpeg.250f72c9aab6d2b88bcb95ed8e2b76d5.jpeg

IMG_1635.thumb.jpeg.5b4a08ce481783509a32458c2b7d3e6a.jpeg

 

The coupling between tender and loco involved a bit of faffing around. I'm using a simple hook on the loco locating into a hole in the tender and that seems to work ok but it might not be the final arrangement. 

 

Alan

  • Like 9
  • WOW! 7
Posted

Simply splendid. I do like a nice clean nickel silver engine. Some lovely work on that tender - I do like the elegant brackets holding up the coal space just adjacent to the tank filler. 

  • Agree 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Galteemore said:

Simply splendid. I do like a nice clean nickel silver engine. Some lovely work on that tender - I do like the elegant brackets holding up the coal space just adjacent to the tank filler. 

Thanks David. I agree, nickel silver does look good. Also, less heat transfer when soldering- less likely that adjacent bits will fall apart. Doesn’t tarnish as badly as brass either. 

  • Agree 1
Posted

Model of the year, and it's only January 6th........

I say this every time Alan but this definitely is your best yet, without question!

The distinctive lines of the prototype have been captured to absolute perfection!

  • Agree 3
Posted
12 minutes ago, Patrick Davey said:

Model of the year, and it's only January 6th........

I say this every time Alan but this definitely is your best yet, without question!

The distinctive lines of the prototype have been captured to absolute perfection!

You're making me blush Patrick. Thank you. This one's been quite a challenge but the crises along the way haven't been too severe (he said with hindsight😄). Mind you, it was threatened with the big hammer last night when the pivot wire for the compensation beam came adrift and the loco developed a limp. Another example of that fitter in charge of the soldering iron doing substandard work. He's been warned before.

This was the first loco I've built where the wheels went on for the first time and didn't have to come off again. Until last night. The front drivers had to come off in order to get at the beam and re-solder it. So, an aspiration still to be achieved. When refitting them using a GW Models quartering jig, the magnet in the motor kept attracting the wheels and making them jump out of the jig. I seemed not to have enough hands for the job. Hence the stirring of the big hammer. Got there eventually and thankfully, it still ran ok after all the messing about.

On this loco, more than any of the others I've done, it's very apparent how out of scale OO 16.5mm gauge is. It may be because No.6's splashers are so prominent. The driving wheels are quite clearly a long way inside them. It would be good to model in 21mm gauge but I'm not sure I'm up for making track. A long finger project, that one.

Alan

  • Like 2
Posted

A classic case of it only being half a dozen pieces for the structure, but add in all the details and it becomes more than a bit complicated! The dinky size of the prototype can't have helped  - overall, looks a lot shorter than a G2 and these aren't exactly giants.

 As ever, very neat, very tidy and very, very good.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, David Holman said:

A classic case of it only being half a dozen pieces for the structure, but add in all the details and it becomes more than a bit complicated! The dinky size of the prototype can't have helped  - overall, looks a lot shorter than a G2 and these aren't exactly giants.

 As ever, very neat, very tidy and very, very good.

Thanks David and you’re right. It needed a fair bit of thinking through to avoid having inaccessible joints that needed soldered. As it was, I’d intended to bolt the bodywork to the frames bur realised too late that I’d missed the opportunity to put in captive nuts. They ended up soldered together. 

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

It's that time again... Paint! 😱 

There were a few hiccups and in keeping with tradition, the cellulose thinners was deployed at least once thanks to some ham-fisted work with the airbrush. However, I'm confident that before the decade is out, I will have figured out how to work it.

Here's No.6 before the paint flew, scrubbed up and with most of its fussy bits loosely attached.

IMG_1639.thumb.jpeg.7a15b0127c3994203b19bc38da736f39.jpeg

 

Then a rattlecan coat of Halfords etch primer.

IMG_1658.thumb.jpeg.14f33dd403c3de0f56e352cd900174ee.jpeg

 

Next, an undercoat of Tamiya acrylic black applied with the airbrush. I didn't use the rivet press for the smokebox so these rivets are Railtec 3D resin transfers. 

IMG_1662.thumb.jpeg.995a29f0c2860bf751da7f0b7431af8c.jpeg

 

Topcoats of Tamiya acrylic dark green XF70. Airbrush again. I don't bother wearing a mask when airbrushing because mostly I stop breathing.

IMG_1677.thumb.jpeg.ef72995b66a12d329d72f39135e58f2a.jpeg

 

The lining will be a challenge on this one because there are curves that won't be possible using transfers.  Can ordinary mortals master a bow pen? How long does it take? 

Drop me a line,

Alan

 

 

 

  • Like 10
Posted (edited)

Lovely. Always a great moment when you start putting the primer on and see the model finally blending into that image you’ve held in your mind for months. I’d be interested in what thinners you used Alan. The SG needs stripped I think - patch painting would not work and there is so much encrusted dust needs shifting; if I strip the paint, the dust will go with it! 

Edited by Galteemore
Posted

Wonderful stuff and great to see the engine and tender together.

Given my personal view of air brushes is that they are the Spawn of Satan, then the bowpen is the creation of even darker forces! Well, not quite, but they take more time to master than I've so far had time for...

 That said, master craftsman Ian Rathbone open a few secrets of the dark arts in his painting and lining book, the key one being the use of enamel thinners and a fine paint brush. Seems even the best don't always get it right, so when inevitable blemishes occur, you wait an hour or two, then dip the brush in thinners, remove most of it and then carefully apply the brush to the offending area. Hey presto, the excess paint lifts off like magic. Still needs care, but definitely works.

 As ever, practice on scrap material beforehand and use transfers wherever you can. You'll either love it or hate it.

David, before you strip the paint off your new loco, might be worth trying T-cut. Shannon was utterly filthy when I acquired it, but it came up really well. If there are paint chips, you can trying filling these in, sand level then over paint and work back after with more T-Cut - though depends how bad the paint is overall.

  • Thanks 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use