Jump to content

StevieB

Members
  • Posts

    1,259
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by StevieB

  1. You really have produced a very realistic model railway with three areas of operational interest and many pieces of scenic interest - you should get it into print sometime. Stephen
  2. What a fine selection of photos - are you able to add a few notes on each location, please? Stephen
  3. Remembering that, when the train reversed at Waterford, the consist would be re-arranged so that the loaded portion was next to the engine and railwaymen always looked for the easy life when shunting. Stephen
  4. Remembering that there would be barrier wagons at each end of the oil tankers, a better consist would be barrier wagon, 4 oil tankers, barrier wagon, 5 magnesite wagons with one of the barrier wagons carrying a 20' container. Stephen
  5. At least one ran with white stripes above and below the windows. Stephen
  6. Irish Freight Models do a good rendition of the magnesite wagon. Most of us have to compromise because of a lack of space so I wonder whether separate oil and magnesite trains would be more convincing. Stephen
  7. Have you thought of running an oil & magnesite train - as you run a Bell Line train already, it would be entirely appropriate. In the meantime, keep up the good work! Stephen
  8. This question has probably been asked before but which mk3's are the best for the Irish version, Jouef, Lima or Hornby? Stephen
  9. I've just heard from Peter Scott that 186 is paired with tender no 175 built in 1922. Attached to his email was a diagram of the arrangement. If I can work out to uphold the attachment, I will do so. Hope this helps. Stephen
  10. So what would be the British equivalent of a 400 class tender, something bigger than the Bachmann C class tender methinks? Ste[hen
  11. 48' 11/4" according to the drawing in the Resources section. It is actually a drawing of the GSV rather than the EGV as above but the overall length didn't change. Stephen
  12. Surely you're not suggesting that RPSI runs the passenger services in the Republic! Stephen
  13. There may not be H&S legislation in the US but then there is there legal system which very often gives a similar result - anyone who has driven in the US will be aware of the level of personal insurance you are required to have just in case! Stephen
  14. I appreciate that we went off course with the discussion re eliminating guards, nevertheless there is evidence that liner trains ran with brake vans. Stephen
  15. From the government's point of view the tunnel route, Dart Overground?,is far preferable cost wise to Dart Underground even though it will not achieve the objective of connecting all routes to the city centre. Stephen
  16. The models for privatising passenger and freight are radically different, and both are a success in terms of traffic carried but that is only one way of looking at the matter. Stephen
  17. The union problem was most likely between the NUR, representing guards, and ASLEF, representing drivers, over having guards in the rear cab of the loco - long before moves to get rid of guards! Stephen
  18. One of the operational benefits of liner trains was that, being continuously braked, there was no need for a brake van at the end of the consist. However, in Both Ireland and the UK the opposition of the trade unions was a major hurdle to overcome, so it was many years before they finally disappeared on such trains. So, my question to those in the know is whether the likes of Bell Line, dolomite and oil and magnesite trains began with a brake van? There is a photo in Irish Railways Past and Present of a liner train departing Waterford in August 1976 complete with brake van but I yet to see photos of any of the three above. Many thanks. Stephen
  19. The trouble with a privatisation like this is that you replace a state monopoly with a private one, albeit regulated. In the UK open access operators are not allowed to compete directly with franchise operators. The only real beneficiary is the state who are paid a fee by the franchise operator. I've always likened it to television companies bidding to cover a particular sports event. Days were when both BBC and ITV showed the FA cup final live - what a long time ago that was - then there was a real competition between the providers of the service. Now the only real beneficiary is the sports event. Hope this post isn't too political. Stephen
  20. This is just another example of meddling by Brussels that is driving the campaign in the UK to leave the EU. Stephen
  21. Reminds me of the kind of layout that Iain Rice might conjure up - very nice.
  22. You are one of those guys who puts the rest of us to shame with your work - long may it continue. Seriously, though, coming along very nicely. Stephen
  23. I have found that, if you unscrew the whole coupling mounting and then re-attach the NEM box on its own, the coupling then clears the track - may be a tad high but that's okay. Stephen
  24. It's a long time since anything was posted on this subject, but I have a question. Tom Brady (IFM) fits his wagon bodies on Dapol chassis and I tried Kadee No18's on two brake vans last night. They fitted beautifully but, in addition to being too long, they were also too low and risked fouling the track. Is this common with Dapol and is the answer to cut off the NEM sockets and just attach No5's to the underside of the chassis? Stephen
  25. StevieB

    121 Class

    Quite by chance I've just looked on the Shapeways website and there is now 4mm body available from Rail 3D Prints for £46.49 plus £17.41 for a set of detailing parts. The 2mm version is designed to go on an SW9 chassis, so no need to chop up a 141/181 chassis. Stephen
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use