DiveController

Roll on the beloved ICRs What was also interesting was the comment form John McCarthy that they would operate at 100mph …… Oh, wait, you'd need appropriate infrastructure for that. Anyway that said, it was a record-breaking heavy-lift operation. I wonder how much time was saved and money spent to speed up the order? I can't help wonder if the order had been submitted a few weeks sooner, whether there would have been a need to airlift her at all or whether GM's factory at London, ON was the limiting factor?

If your modeling is better (or seems better to you) while inebriated, then have a Happy New Year and happy modeling! (TYPO Fixed above 12 Days OF Christmas)

=)) A bit late, Dave but appreciated! Optional?……. Is that the new urban slang for essential? Otherwise your post is 'phat' and 'sick' …...hope I'm not breaching the forum rules on the (mis)use of the 'English' language 12 days OF Christmas, Rich (then follows sobriety, for an indeterminate period) You're still in time Merry Christmas!

Same, Tom. Sorry

Gotta agree with Weshty here. I'm subscribed to this thread so been waiting patiently for an update. Definitely worth the wait. l remember that skew bridge from my childhood and the model's really perfect. Even the steps beneath. I think all the superlatives have been used. You should be very proud of that:drool:

Child's play for you, Eoin. Didn't even need the high-amp cutter gizmo! Wish the models were all that easy:D Happy Christmas, guys!

This is the sum total of my modeling efforts for today, Christmas Eve. I'm calling it the gatekeepers cottage since it was a joint effort between me and what I hope will be the next generation of railway modeller presently aged four years old! Upstairs are "Dad's trains" (which can be taken for a spin on a couple of DC loops, and treated with the utmost respect) and 5'x3' play table covered with Thomas the Tank Engine tracks, stations, and engines!

Merry Christmas, John! I guess in NZ you're already on Christmas Day so You get to open your prezzies first. A little ways still to go over here in US. However,…. NZPS & USPS have done well this time, kits arrived unexpectedly early and in time for Christmas! Depends on whether your nearer to Mayner or more in west Kerry nearer me:D As soon as you can get away with it would be my opinion! Merry Christmas everyone!!

Thanks, David & Maitland. I remember Grayrigg now that you mentioned it. Completely preventable, 5 years for the furore to die down, a paltry slap on the wrist (no, £4m isn't really that much (and better spent on track maintenance, I know)), and a knighthood to boot. Spectacular!

Some of the measurements seems critical to success and maybe easier to do in O gauge than OO?

I'm not reading anything above. Spoiler alert!

How does that run, Noel? I think the SW1500 is a recommended donor chassis for the MIR 121 kit, iirc. As a connoisseur of centre drive double flywheel motors, would value your opinion on that or a video if possible? K

Eh,… same question, Des, what chassis and how does it run?

Great little thread, I considered trying to buy a Dublo crane on eBay after this but it went for too much so I opted out of the bidding. Are these superior in any way to the more modern plastic version? they're not prototypically correct if I recall and Eoin seems to think they need a little refining. Nice little thing though, IMHO

So I wonder why they needed interlaced track then but in this age of health and safety and high viz vests and …. Well, why go with to a facing "Y" point now? Are modern points more reliable with regard to absence of potential derailing, someone decided it had been unnecessary in the first place on safety grounds, or what? The bridge is no lower now and I presume if the bridge itself was not going to 'hold' a derailing loco then it would not do any better job now. We did have a discussion about facing points and modern stiffer track on another thread here in the last year or so but I'm not sure if any of that factors into this? Was the interlaced track controlled by a token/key as there were separate up down lines but these would normally overlap/interlace as here? Were the tracks interlaced because bridge was too narrow or could not support the weight of two trains on the bridge simultaneously?

Not exactly, the first wagon is actually green with a heavy coat of rust. The browns probably outnumber them 3:1 now

Hehehe I'd never have believed it! It's not your usual flavor of Black'n'Tan for sure I think this B-B switcher (SW1500) is still current, photos of her up to two years ago but mainly in the US Midwest http://www.rrpicturearchives.net/locopicture.aspx?id=15663

So was I Think you've used that one before, JB but I like it:D Agreed. My personal MacBook Pro has been very trusty indeed until this week when augmented multi-mode authentication plus a software upgrade at work left my OSX 10.7 no longer supported for remote access. Time for a long overdue replacement for the iMac that is still in perfect order behind me, also no longer 'supported' due to it G5. So a new iMac will be purchased no doubt in the New Year which may finally spur me to contemplate what to design for the newly negotiated real estate

Old Hornby Dublo. Are these metal or plastic?

I think he's wondering if there's an app for that?

I don't have much interest (yet) in US outline but I know many on the site do, so I took 5 minutes to stop off on the commute today to shoot some ad hoc video of BNSF locos that occasionally make me 15 minutes late for work if I hit the wrong R/R crossing! Shot on the spur of the moment in adverse lighting (into bright sunlight) with an iPhone so sorry about the video quality Blooper, so look like I can't upload the video from the Mac directly, so all I can give you is this

Billyboy, I think your loco may be preserved (or, at least has not been scrapped) as one of the few survivors of the S-2 class switcher http://www.trha.ca/locomotives.html#cp7020 My only Canadian National one of the successors an Alco (MLW) C424 by Atlas

Paul, given the opinion of several members offered on the thread, it seems more likely than not that you may be mistaken on this point. I was never there so cannot comment one way or the other. Nonetheless, I have to agree with Dave on this point that, having read the thread, the decision to hand out a temporary ban without warning on this difference of opinion seems unnecessarily harsh and to my mind of limited value. I do not think it impartial for a moderator as a protagonist in the disputed opinion to hand out a ban when the moderator on this forum appears to be garfieldsghost. The site a a source of information, support, and enjoyment for all the members, punctuated by occasional hiccoughs. Frequent bans and thread locking are detrimental to to the site and potential membership as we are in general terms a small community. I hope that everyone will have had an opportunity to reflect overnight and that we can all resume tomorrow. Regards to all

Looks like ergonomics was not a priority for driver or passengers