Jump to content
  • 0

Layout Wiring

Rate this question


Question

Posted

I am considering sending a layout drawing to Peco Technical Advice for wiring advice but wondered if there was anyone on the forum who is equally familiar with the wiring expertise, who would be willing to help.

 

I have a drawing with all Peco points shown.

 

Any takers?

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted
I am considering sending a layout drawing to Peco Technical Advice for wiring advice but wondered if there was anyone on the forum who is equally familiar with the wiring expertise, who would be willing to help.

 

I have a drawing with all Peco points shown.

 

Any takers?

 

 

You'll be waiting on a response from Peco! They are quite bad at responding to enquiries.

 

What particular area do you need help on?

  • 0
Posted
Dave, since I have used electro-frog points throughout I just have no experience of wiring. I want to get it right before I fix track to my baseboard.

 

You'll don't need to modify an electrofrog point they work just fine straight out of the box, just fit insulated rail joiners on the vee of the point to stop any short circuits as the vee switches polarity as it switches.

 

The only real need to modify an electrofrog point is if your weathering and painting the track, this way you need to fit an auxiliary switch to the point motor and isolate the vee from the rest of the point and the switch powers the vee and the blades therefore you are no longer relying on the blades bringing power up the point into the vee.

 

On the majority of layouts that I build I leave the electrofrog points as they are and they work fine.

  • 0
Posted

Hi Tony,

 

Looks good - are there any particular areas in the plan you're not sure on?

 

otherwise, simply connect droppers to the rails in every area where there is regular track, use insulated rail joiners on every connection on every point, and then power the points directly

  • 0
Posted (edited)
Hi Tony,

 

Looks good - are there any particular areas in the plan you're not sure on?

 

otherwise, simply connect droppers to the rails in every area where there is regular track, use insulated rail joiners on every connection on every point, and then power the points directly

 

Do I simply isolate the points at every cross-over and wire all points independently? What do you mean by 'droppers'?

Edited by TonyMcGartland
  • 0
Posted
Do I simply isolate the points at every cross-over and wire all points independently? What do you mean by 'droppers'?

 

A dropper is a wire from each rail down through the baseboard, to allow connections to be made 'out-of-the-way'.

 

IMG_3109.jpg

  • 0
Posted

Broithe, thanks for that - simple explanation. Now this may sound stupid but I have a Gaugemaster Twin controller. Is this sufficient to run this layout considering I will be operating two engines max at a time - one on a continuous timed shuttle and another for manual shunting?

  • 0
Posted
Broithe, thanks for that - simple explanation. Now this may sound stupid but I have a Gaugemaster Twin controller. Is this sufficient to run this layout considering I will be operating two engines max at a time - one on a continuous timed shuttle and another for manual shunting?

 

I am confident that you should have no trouble from the Gaugemaster.

 

Just avoid running huge quantities of lighting from it.

  • 0
Posted

Is it possible to bring the cables from various positions on the track (mainline, paintwork and sidings) to ONE terminal on my control. Would I use a junction box, or series of switches?

  • 0
Posted

If you're running two engines at the same time, you should have a means of separating the circuits and using one of the controllers for each one - the Model D has two track outputs at the rear - one for each control knob.

  • 0
Posted

I simply could never get my head round wiring electrofrog points. The old way was simple. years ago, for the last layout I had which was in planning stage about 1983, I sent a diagram to Peco and they replied promptly. Maybe they're not the same nowadays.

  • 0
Posted

It's often feasible to lay the track, wired-up, loosely on the bare baseboard - and test it out with all plausible scenarios, before 'hiding' the wiring underneath.

 

When you're happy with it, the track can be fixed and the droppers dropped.

  • 0
Posted (edited)

Are you using point motors or switching by hand, presume DCC?

Lots on YouTube and the WWW, some unnecessarily complicated (which it isn't)

The basics if you don't have a book

http://www.dccwiki.com/Wiring_Turnouts

 

Agree with PJR, that's a good resource

 

Personally I would run a main bus wire under the track work with droppers as suggested above. If using point motors I would isolate the frog so that the entire frog changes polarity when the normal or diverging route is selected. If not, tracks of opposite polarity are in close proximity at the frog, and metal wheels sometimes make contact with both shorting out the layout which is irritating.

It also avoids relying on a small contact area at the switch blades being the only real source of electrical current to the frog especially in sidings and crossovers. Just two cents

Edited by DiveController
  • 0
Posted (edited)

Hi Tony , I attach a first pass , thi sis based on the most minimal requirements that you are happy to have sidings /terminating tracks dead, when the point switches away from that road . Its not necessary to isolate ALL frogs in electro points , merely the ones where a back feed from another supply could occur

 

note that this diagram contains minimal droppers, only those electrically necessary , you may add additional ones to either ( a) power up sections that are dead when the point is switched away or (b) where you dont want to rely on fishplates for continuity . In (b) this is just parallel wiring to the track but every time you go " through " a point with a dropper, it needs to be insulated

 

Again if you want two independent controllers, you'll have to implement section switching , for that the first thing to decide is if you want each controller to access all track of the other, or are you prepared to dedicate a controller to an area, the first adds a lot of section switches, the second less so

 

 

DCC is much easier to wire !

 

note again , om my diagram below, there is a single controller and no additional switches , the frog " steer " the power to the selected roads

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]26445[/ATTACH

Omagh North.jpg

Edited by Junctionmad
  • 0
Posted
Hi Tony , I attach a first pass , thi sis based on the most minimal requirements that you are happy to have sidings /terminating tracks dead, when the point switches away from that road . Its not necessary to isolate ALL frogs in electro points , merely the ones where a back feed from another supply could occur

 

note that this diagram contains minimal droppers, only those electrically necessary , you may add additional ones to either ( a) power up sections that are dead when the point is switched away or (b) where you dont want to rely on fishplates for continuity . In (b) this is just parallel wiring to the track but every time you go " through " a point with a dropper, it needs to be insulated

 

Again if you want two independent controllers, you'll have to implement section switching , for that the first thing to decide is if you want each controller to access all track of the other, or are you prepared to dedicate a controller to an area, the first adds a lot of section switches, the second less so

 

 

DCC is much easier to wire !

 

note again , om my diagram below, there is a single controller and no additional switches , the frog " steer " the power to the selected roads

 

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]26445[/ATTACH

 

Nice one JM

  • 0
Posted

My baseboard measures 2metres x 500mm and sits nicely on a trestle style table of similar size. During the construction phase I didn't really think about where I would place my controls. I have a Gaugemaster Dual Control, a super controller and three DPDT switches to consider. Should I mount them on a hanging bracket and shelf under the table, otherwise it will look out of place on the baseboard.

  • 0
Posted
Are Peco PL-80 Powered Joiners a waste of money?

 

Droppers soldered to each rail would be more secure, long term. The rail joiners still rely on a 'frictional' connection to the rails, which can cause resistance issues over time.

  • 0
Posted

Here is my plan, hopefully someone can tell me if I am correct in doing this.

 

I intend wiring my layout below surface next week. The plan is to soldier the cables to the track and drop them through the baseboard where they were go via block connectors to three separate DPDT switches. I intend recessing the DPDT switches into an panel of black perspex and mounting this on the top of my baseboard in a place where I hope to operate the layout from.My gauge master twin controller will sit below the baseboard tables in a small shelf.

  • 0
Posted
Here is my plan, hopefully someone can tell me if I am correct in doing this.

 

I intend wiring my layout below surface next week. The plan is to soldier the cables to the track and drop them through the baseboard where they were go via block connectors to three separate DPDT switches. I intend recessing the DPDT switches into an panel of black perspex and mounting this on the top of my baseboard in a place where I hope to operate the layout from.My gauge master twin controller will sit below the baseboard tables in a small shelf.

 

Is it worth having the controller on a sort of slide-out shelf? So that it can be accessible when in use, but out of the way when you're working on the layout, etc. I did that once and I'm sure that we would have found the controller in the way, when it wasn't in use.

  • 0
Posted

Good point, to be honest the Gaugemaster Twin is a bit of a beast of a controller. I bought it new for £50 which was a real bargain, otherwise I would have shopped around for something more compact. Anyway, I'm planning on doing the wiring this weekend hopefully and will

look at that too, thanks

  • 0
Posted
Silly question, when wiring a layout do I bore holes for 'droppers' and feed the cable from under?

 

Correct. Here's a video which helps explain:

 

 

If you want the wires to be less intrusive, I've seen guys tin the wires with solder and place them on the underside of the rail while touching the top of the rail with the iron. I'd experiment on a spare piece of track first, though...

  • 0
Posted

I've been trying most of the afternoon to solder droppers to my Peco track with no success really, very messy with hit and miss results.

Never was able to do it, any tips?

  • 0
Posted

Make sure you clean the rails where you are going to solder, a fibreglass pencil will do the job. Tin the wires beforehand, a drop of flux on the rail, tiny piece of solder on the iron, place the wire against the rail, touch the wire with the iron, remove the heat but hold the wire in place for 5 secs, job done.

  • 0
Posted
Make sure you clean the rails where you are going to solder, a fibreglass pencil will do the job. Tin the wires beforehand, a drop of flux on the rail, tiny piece of solder on the iron, place the wire against the rail, touch the wire with the iron, remove the heat but hold the wire in place for 5 secs, job done.

 

Using that exact method, here's a (poor) shot of how I connected the droppers on mine

 

IMG_3117.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use