Mol_PMB

Yep, I’m too young to remember them anything other than blue. And I still need to organise myself a trip behind Uranus to see a black one…

Ah, I should have consulted my library before asking a daft question! I did nearly include green as an option. I must go back and re-read the GNRI locos tome.

Beautiful work! Really captures the lines of the real thing. Will she be blue or black?

I suspect that the most practical way forward involves Templot and 3D printing. I think 3D printed track bases for both plain line and turnouts would actually be very easy to produce, with an understanding of Templot and 3D printers. Certainly people are churning them out in other gauges and I think the track gauge is just a simple input parameter to Templot However, 3D is not my strength. My mind works best with 2D stuff like etches and laser cutting. So I don’t draw in 3D CAD and I don’t have a 3D printing capability. We do have some people on the forum who are good at 3D printing.

Axleboxes soldered in place, and wire fitted for spring hangers. That's all for this weekend, there may be more tomorrow evening.

I've been making some progress on the frames this afternoon, though I'm not going to get them finished today, which had been my target. Some of the details are a bit fiddly: the spring hanger brackets seemed to be particularly prone to pinging off somewhere and being eaten by the carpet monster. Fortunately I had forseen this and included some spares on the etch! They look neat when done though. I've also put some strips of lead flashing into the fuel tanks which have added a useful 25g to the weight. The underside now looks like this. By design, there is a compromise in the position of the frames - they ought to be about 2mm closer together in reality, behind the buffer centres. In the model, the combined effects of 21mm gauge wheelsets with slightly overscale width treads, the extra sideplay needed for a 3-axle loco on trainset curves, and the need for the wheels to be electrically insulated from the frames, all meant that I had to place the frames a bit further apart than the prototype. That does have the secondary advantage of the buffers not being directly aligned with the frames, thus enabling sprung buffers to be fitted. However, for a 16.5mm gauge model the frames could perhaps be placed closer together. I've now started playing with the axlebox castings. These are intended for LMS Ivatt tenders and they are the closest I could find, but they're a little bit too deep and wide for the E class. I'm sanding them down to fit. Combined with the frames being slightly further apart, the axleboxes seem to stand out a bit more than on the prototype, but I hope it won't be too noticeable when complete and covered in some grime. There are still quite a few fiddly details to add to the frames and footplate; this stage is taking longer than expected but I'm still pleased with how it's looking.

Thanks! I know what I'm going to do for my own model(s) and can make this available for others. That will be an etched chassis with the capability for fitting hornblocks and suspension/compensation for 21mm gauge. Designed for use with High Level motor/gearbox but I'm sure there are other options. It will also be buildable for 16.5mm gauge and I can include 2 sets of frame stretchers to suit the different gauges. I think fitting in the power transmission as well as the hornblocks will be difficult in 16.5mm gauge but I'm sure there's a way! I think a cheap and reliable RTR solution for 16.5mm gauge is the Fleischmann V60 chassis. I've now purchased an old one of these although I haven't got it yet. I will check that it fits and design some brackets to mate it to the loco body. An option that's intermediate in cost, complexity and fidelity is a custom BullAnt chassis based on their diesel motor bogie. Unless the V60 turns out to be unsuitable, I won't be taking the lead on the BullAnt option but if someone else wants to try this out then I'm happy to help.

NIR 111: https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/167303724993

Agreed. I don't think 21mm gauge track is a licence to print money. Imagining IRM's point of view, promoting 21mm gauge adds extra challenges and costs to design models to suit multiple gauges, which may compromise the design of the more numerous 16.5mm gauge versions. Doesn't feel like good business sense, so I can appreciate their position. For those of us who do like 21mm gauge, whether for 4mm scale 5'3" or 7mm scale 3' gauge, there are a host of different wheel and flanegway standards in use. However, for the flexitrack most of those don't matter, it's only the actual track gauge that needs to be agreed*. And that's 21mm, right? I've seen mention of 20.2mm as a theoretical EM-equivalent but is there anyone actually using it? For comparison, here's an example plastic sleeper base for 22.2mm gauge, Swiss metre gauge in 1:45 continental O scale (one of my other projects). In that scale there are multiple standards too, the older RTR stuff was 22.5mm gauge with coarse wheels and flangeways, but more recent RTR models and most high-end models and scratchbuilt models use a finer scale and 22.2mm gauge. This track base takes Peco code 100 flat-bottom rail. * there may be other issues such as bullhead vs flat-bottom, sleeper spacing, wooden vs concrete etc, but those are matters of appearance not compatibility.

Thanks DJD, a good summary. For flexitrack, it's worth remembering that the part needed is one moulding, of maybe 8 sleepers and rail fastenings connected by webs. It can be made to fit standard Peco rail, which the user could buy separately and feed into the sleepers. A dozen of those mouldings would make up a yard of track. To build 10 yards of track would use 120 of those moulded parts. If there's a few people interested, the numbers add up quite quickly, and would probably tip the balance towards injection moulding rather than 3D printing. But even the availability of a 3D printed part would be very welcome. By just supplying the mouldings they would be a small and lightweight product, easy to ship.

I've had a read.

Wheel standards are one of the challenges, I agree. But not impossible. Worth a discussion.

I’m idly wondering what to do next. NIR 1 class is another notable gap to fill, but the lack of dimensions and drawings is a problem. Something else built at Inchicore at the same time as the E401s? Very niche but arguably better than 36001.

Excellent! So it’s surely only a very small step for IRM to offer 21mm gauge wheelsets for the Irish locos?

Many thanks. I have to confess this is going together better than I expected. There are a few minor issues I would change with the benefit of hindsight but nothing major so far. Just waiting on IRM to piss on my chips with an RTR version! Seriously, I don’t think there will ever be a mass market for an E401 but maybe there’s a handful of people on here who might be interested in making one, and I could mention it on RMweb I suppose. Once I’ve finished the body kit I will have to develop the chassis. Several options and that will depend on who is interested and what gauge they are working in.

Next up - IRM models in 21mm gauge? Accurascale offer P4 wheelsets. Just saying…

Very nice! I have bought some of their rat buffers for my E class.

This morning I've done most of the footplate and fuel tank subassembly. Quite pleased with how this has worked out, especially the steps. I still need to tackle the cosmetic frames and a few other details, as well as writing the next chapter of the instructions. However, I couldn't resist bolting together the main parts to see how it looks. I'm sure there will be some more fettling needed but this gives the right sort of impression I think.

The Atlas O EMD switcher exists in a version with flexicoil trucks, which are similar to but not identical to the Irish locos. But once you start looking at the details and dimensions the body is very different from a 121. Plus US O scale is 1:48, though that makes 32mm gauge track more like broad gauge. All this will be irrelevant when AS/IRM announce their O gauge range for you.

Attached are a completed set of the bonnet top instructions (including the plumbing) and a newly-written set of instructions for the cab. Making an E401 - the bonnet top and exhaust cowl.pdf Making an E401 - the cab.pdf Now I can start work on the footplate and frames.

That would be intriguing, though none of those prototypes really belong together. Maybe they could repaint a Heljan O gauge class 33 in orange and black to go with the Mk2 coaches? They've also made noises about the BAC Peckett, which is 3' gauge. They could do that in 7mm scale, but it would need some more of that damn 21mm gauge track

I don't expect all of those will be delivered in the coming year, so you have some time to save up! I'm intrigued to see what's coming. I wonder whether there will be an announcement of something once the warehouse move is all done and dusted?

Many thanks for the update, it’s good to understand the reasoning. Incidentally on the IRM website I had registered to be emailed when surplus grain vans became available, but I guess that may not work if the new stock will only be listed on Accurascale. I’ve re-registered my interest on the Accurascale website too. If my IRM and AS points get merged I might even have enough points to pay for a pack of wagons Cheers, Mol

I've got the cab assembly virtually completed now, and we can begin to see what the loco's going to look like. The cab headlight parts turned out to fit perfectly and were much easier than I expected. They were a tricky detail to reproduce. Tomorrow, the footplate and frames...

Very nice indeed! Looking forward to seeing these completed and the loco started