Jump to content

Ernies Massive Irish 1930's to 2005 Photo Archive

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, minister_for_hardship said:

Should have had more 500s, and forget about building the three enormous white (or is that green?) elephants.

The Late Drew Donaldson had a very high opinion of the 500s, a view shared by others, so yes, you are right that more of them would have been good, but I'm pretty sure that he wouldn't have agreed with you about the 800s!

They had the misfortune to be built just as war loomed (of course, there should never have been a war at all, but that's another issue) so never had a chance to show how good they were (or not). The Blessed Oliver put paid to any future they might have had by ordering the A Class in the mid-fifties.

Of course, for a country with little steam-able coal, they were a nonesense as even in 1939 the yanks were proving that diesels offered a future?

Now, having acted as an Agent provocateur, let me make another suggestion.

Perhaps Ireland should have looked at electric traction? There's a long and well reasoned article in IRRS Journal Volume 1 on railway electrification - it concluded that it wasn't on then (1947/8) as it would have wolfed up masses of capital and a high proportion of the electricity then generated. It DID touch on  battery power, which Dr Drumm had proved was workable and touched on partial electrification (like the "power islands" they're talking about today, to zap power into battery trains and which we will soon see - seventy years later).

Another what if?

  • Like 4
Posted
10 hours ago, Horsetan said:

Seems that the only tapered boilers that the GSR/CIE ever dealt with were those on the Woolwich Moguls. Everything else was strictly parallel.

Interestingly some of the large Coey era  GSWR 4-4-0s retained tapered boilers until rebuilt by the GSR with superheated boilers during the 1930s. Apparently tapered boilers were introduced during the 1900s to keep the axleloading of the 321 and 333 Class 4-4-0s within the Civil Engineers limits. Some of the 4-4-0s were rebuilt before the (1925) Amalgamation with new heavier frames, but retaining the original tapered boilers after axle loading was increased following the re-laying of the Main Line.

308 - Coey GSWR Class 305 4-4-0 - built 1902 at Inchicore Works - 1904 rebuilt, 1925 to GSR - withdrawn 1933. Class D 2 - 339 - Coey GS&WR Class 333 4-4-0, built 1908 by Inchicore Works - 1925 to GSR, 1933 rebuilt with superheated Belpaire boiler, 1945 to CIE - withdrawn 1959 - seen here at Bray in 1932. Class D12 - 307 - Coey GS&WR Class 305 4-4-0, built 1902 by Inchicore Works - 1906 rebuilt, 1925 to GSR, 1937 rebuilt with Belpaire boiler, 1945 to CIE - withdrawn 1959 - seen here at Limerick Junction in 1932.

The 800 Class & Drumm Battery trains.

There was certainly an element of national pride in the 800 Class and Drumm Trains C&D also introduced 1939. C&D had a modern contemporary appearance not unlike the LMS Leyland articulated railcar set trialed on the Oxford-Cambridge line around the same time. C&D were let down by using refurbished batteries from the original Drumm trains A&B, the refurbished batteries becoming life expired after approx 5 years.

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
On 10/12/2024 at 2:24 AM, leslie10646 said:

Now, having acted as an Agent provocateur, let me make another suggestion.

Perhaps Ireland should have looked at electric traction? There's a long and well reasoned article in IRRS Journal Volume 1 on railway electrification - it concluded that it wasn't on then (1947/8) as it would have wolfed up masses of capital and a high proportion of the electricity then generated. It DID touch on  battery power, which Dr Drumm had proved was workable and touched on partial electrification (like the "power islands" they're talking about today, to zap power into battery trains and which we will soon see - seventy years later).

Another what if?

There is a story of Bulleid explaining his concept of a fireless main-line  loco to a group of workers during an after dinner strole around the Tender Shop during his early days at Inchacore.  It appear the guys asked Bullied about his plans for a new loco and he drew up a sketch (concept drawing) of a fireless loco that would be 'topped up' at a series of charging stations around the network.  

I guess we will never know whether there is some truth to the story.

The ESB substantially increased it power generation capacity from Hydro and Peat from the late 40s onwards against a background of economic stagnation and a falling population.

The railways may have been seen as a means of absorbing some of the additional capacity in the same way as the GSR was enticed (manipulated) into building the Drumm Battery trains by the offer of 'cheap electricity' from the Shannon Scheme. 

Whatever about fireless locos topped up by lineside generating plants, development of the Drumm principal with partial electrification would have been feasible and fitted in with the social and economic aspirations of the 1st 'Inter-party' Government elected in 1948 (Declare a Republic, attempt to set up a 'Welfare State" (Mother and Child scheme) based on the UK model, and lay groundwork for the Republics economic transformation from the 60s onwards. 

A  change from a railway a railway that mainly exported cattle and people, to one that carried mineral and manufacturing outputs to the ports from the 60s to the 90s  to the contemporary railway that mainly transports commuters to their offices in the cities.

Faced with the reality of a stagnant economy, the railway worsening financial position, CIE had to modernise 'on the cheap" with diesel traction and cheaply built stock good for 20 or so years.

Still at the end of the day a modern variant of Drumm's Battery trains are likely to resume operation in Ireland over 90 years after the initial trials on the GSR. 

 

Edited by Mayner
  • Like 3
  • Informative 1
Posted
On 27/11/2024 at 8:37 AM, Irishswissernie said:

In the pipeline I am working through a set of colour slides taken in June 1964 covering the UTA lines at that time

I'm still awaiting the remainder of these slides plus the details so in the meantime  here are some Dia Dema negatives taken in the early 1960's

x217 GNRI 1960 -xx -CA Lurgan WT 50.

x237GNRI 1965-08 Belfast Maysfield from train hauled by UG 48 going to Belfast Queens Quay.

x250 NCC  1964-06-28 Coleraine WT 10 on 6.35 ECS ex Londonderry.

 

x217 GNRI 1960 -xx -CA Lurgan WT 50 x237GNRI 1965-08 Belfast Maysfield from train hauled by UG 48 going to Belfast Queens Quay x250 NCC  1964-06-28 Coleraine WT 10 on 6.35 ECS ex Londonderry.

 

  • Like 14
Posted
18 hours ago, Irishswissernie said:

CIE 1956-04-26 Youghal A17 yj140.

CB&SC 1958-05-xx Courtmacsherry C232 Excursion from Cork yj122.

CIE 1982-06-28 Tullamore yj147

 

CIE 1956-04-26 Youghal A17 yj140 yj122 CB&SC 1958-05-xx Courtmacsherry C232 Excursion from Cork yj122 CIE 1982-06-28 Tullamore yj147

 

I believe the Mark 3s didn't arrive until 1984 so the date for tullamore may be incorrect. 

Great set of photos though, nonetheless.

  • Agree 1
Posted
4 hours ago, geraghtyg said:

I believe the Mark 3s didn't arrive until 1984 so the date for tullamore may be incorrect. 

Great set of photos though, nonetheless.

The first two Mk3s have been tipp-exed placing the date at 1987 or later, but the loco and other visible Mk3s have not. Purely on those livery proportions I’d estimate around 1989. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Lovely bright picture of the A Class at Youghal - a good buy on your behalf - pretty eye catching and an interesting set of coaching stock.

I even notice one of my  GSWR 10 ton brake vans in the background!

  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, Irishswissernie said:

I have amended the date to 1989. A number of the later slides with the 'YJ' ref letters at the beginning appear to have had the details added later so if anyone has reservations about the date please put a post on.

Jonathan Allen has a shot of 072 in Tip-ex and IR on the front taken on  1 April 1988 so taking into account

the foliage I am re-amending to 28 June 1987.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use