Jump to content

British locos and stock that can be disguised as Irish

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Posted
56 minutes ago, gibbo675 said:

.As for cutting and shutting locomotive bodies I've never had a problem with the grade of plastic that Hornby use as it generally takes solvents really well. I usually fit a backing strip made form either .030" or .040" plasticard as well.

Unfortunately I found that Plastic Weld didn't sufficiently fuse the Class 40 sections together well enough, despite also using styrene strip to overlap the joins inside, resulting in a split. The only way I could get them to co-operate was to - very delicately - drill for locator pins to keep it all aligned.

The Hornby Hymek bogie is a little too short in the wheelbase to match the B101. Only the Heljan Hymek is dead-on.

Posted
1 hour ago, gibbo675 said:

Hi there Galteemore,

Here are some of mine to be going on with, all built from Hornby Stanier coaches. They are all featured on my ongoing thread along with all sorts of other projects.

DSCF2371.thumb.JPG.e3b6711f710762bd67c62452162cb99a.JPG

GNRI L14 open third brake.

DSCF2372.thumb.JPG.8d86e4d08938e1f91c5ab919cd961280.JPG

GNRI K15 open third.

DSCF2373.thumb.JPG.e66ddab6565fff701bae4d8438c465d2.JPG

GSR Bredin corridor third.

DSCF2374.thumb.JPG.4368df2791fc53137fa57cffc5ac713e.JPG

GNRI F16 corridor composite.

Brilliant stuff, Gibbo!

16 hours ago, Mayner said:

The Midland Great Western had a two rectaangular tank wagons 1108 & 1967 used for cresote traffic between the North Wall and Liffey Junctionsleeper depot and cresoting plant. The Midland bought a pair of RCH pattern tanks (5'8" diameter) for cresote traffic from Charles Roberts in 1915. Its possible both types may have lingered on in service into CIE days. (Notes MGWR Wagon Stock P O'Cuimin  IRRS Journal 1969?)  

Haven't seen a photo of either type of wagon, its possible that the other large companies may have used similar wagons to transport cresote from the ports to their cresote plants.

Yes, they were. There were two used on the Loughrea branch, though I don't know their history, I believe they were used to bring fuel in for the resident G class locos. One was believed to have a tank which originated on the West Clare, probably to bring diesel toi Kilkee to fuel the railcar which did the Kilrush branch shuttle. However, such vehicles were as far as I know, always "departmental" wagons, rather than used for commercial traffic.

As an aside, for the general readership, with no petrol industry or milk tank traffic here, tank wagons were extremely rare in Ireland, and almost all that we ever had ( a few exceptions) used for railway use.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, jhb171achill said:

Brilliant stuff, Gibbo!

Yes, they were. There were two used on the Loughrea branch, though I don't know their history, I believe they were used to bring fuel in for the resident G class locos. One was believed to have a tank which originated on the West Clare, probably to bring diesel toi Kilkee to fuel the railcar which did the Kilrush branch shuttle. However, such vehicles were as far as I know, always "departmental" wagons, rather than used for commercial traffic.

As an aside, for the general readership, with no petrol industry or milk tank traffic here, tank wagons were extremely rare in Ireland, and almost all that we ever had ( a few exceptions) used for railway use.

 

The Loughrea fueling tank appears to have used the tank once used on the West Clare mounted on a 'modified" Ballast Wagon. quite unlike the purpose built rectangular tank wagons used for tar traffic in Great Britain.

There were rumours that the tank may have originally used for oil firing steam locos during the 1947 Fuel Crisis, the conversion does not appear the most professional with planks and timber packers apparrently supporting the tank brackets as opposed to a more engineered approach likely to be adapted by Inchacore or Limerick

1Loughrea08082024.thumb.jpg.459aafc522bd833372fbb6d3a7018e49.jpg

 

Not sure if JHB was thinking in terms of tank wagons in general that tank wagons were extremely rare in Ireland and almost all (with few exceptions) used for railway use. 

While generally true of the post 70s Block Train era where ESSO Claremorris, Irish Cement and Burmah were the main revenue commercial oil traffic sources, the Major Oil Companies and their Irish Distributors distributed their product by rail as wagons loads from the Ports in private owner tank cars until replaced with a road tanker fleet duirng the 60s-70s. Much of the traffic would have been single tank cars to oil depots at relatively small country stations in similar RCH pattern tank wagons to those used in the UK. Most companies had rail served terminals on Dublin's Alexandra Rd tramway, Irish Shell & BP its own Planet diesel loco.

Many of the wagons appear to have been a 1927 (UK) RCH design, though Caltex invested in a fleet pf 'modern" anchor mounted but unfitted tank wagons in 1960 and ESSO imported vacuum fitted wagons from the UK in the late 60s for its Sligo, Claremorris and a short lived Oranmore traffic flows.

While the companies invested heavily in new high capacity tank wagons for use in Great Britain during the early 1960s, the old wagons soldiered on in Ireland until late 60s/early 70s. Esso used modern but essentially obsolete wagons from the Britain for its traffic to the West. 

Its possible a re-liveried Oxford tank wagon may pass for a 'typical" Irish company wagon.

2Mex08082024.thumb.jpg.eb4f9848affe110c044eaf48f4067214.jpg

Mex (Mc Mullen Bros?) Class A tank (two compartments different grades of petrol or petrol and TVO?)

7IrishShell08082024.thumb.jpg.d8eba8e2e294ea4229bb46aa6a5d73d8.jpg

Another Class A (highly flammable) wagon dumped/stored at East Wall late 1990s

4ESSOl08082024.thumb.jpg.f1473f9098efa6decf8c856b29a61dbe.jpg

ESSO logo just about visible Class B (Diesel, heavy fuel) Black

6ShellMexNI08082024.thumb.jpg.97b539dda899e0dd343c3584e4bbf7ba.jpg

 

Makers photo Shell-Mex Northern Ireland

Many of the old private owner wagons in the South ended up stored/dumped near Sheriff St Signal box North Wall and may have been used for departmental use before scrapping.

At one stage the Alexandra Road-Inchacore fuel train was made up of 1960 Clatex-Texaco tank wagons with Caltex 'grinning: through the Texaco marking.

5Caltex08082024.thumb.jpg.287af476c9387a1ce64bab7f870639f9.jpg

 

 

Edited by Mayner
  • Like 3
  • Informative 3
Posted
23 hours ago, Galteemore said:

Would love to see some photos of your work HT - sounds really good stuff.

 

This is the test photo I took. One half of the Heljan Hymek bogie casing is on the sprue, and the standard spur gears are lined up. At the time it wasn't possible to buy the individual gears from Heljan or their service agents, but I worked out that they were 12-tooth, Mod 0.5, plastic spurs which were available on eBay from a stockist in Hong Kong. I bought quite a lot of them, and they are a perfect mesh with the original Heljan gears.

You should be able to see the new middle axle position which I drilled under the 2nd/3rd gear. It lies exactly on the scale 5'3" point between the outer axles.

It's so close to hitting the gear teeth that there's no room to allow the axle to rise. If it were possible to move the gear centres, life might be easier, but these are fixed by the manufacturer.

 

spacer.png

  • Like 1
  • WOW! 1
Posted
On 8/8/2024 at 10:13 AM, Mayner said:

 

The Loughrea fueling tank appears to have used the tank once used on the West Clare mounted on a 'modified" Ballast Wagon. quite unlike the purpose built rectangular tank wagons used for tar traffic in Great Britain.

There were rumours that the tank may have originally used for oil firing steam locos during the 1947 Fuel Crisis, the conversion does not appear the most professional with planks and timber packers apparrently supporting the tank brackets as opposed to a more engineered approach likely to be adapted by Inchacore or Limerick

1Loughrea08082024.thumb.jpg.459aafc522bd833372fbb6d3a7018e49.jpg

 

Not sure if JHB was thinking in terms of tank wagons in general that tank wagons were extremely rare in Ireland and almost all (with few exceptions) used for railway use. 

While generally true of the post 70s Block Train era where ESSO Claremorris, Irish Cement and Burmah were the main revenue commercial oil traffic sources, the Major Oil Companies and their Irish Distributors distributed their product by rail as wagons loads from the Ports in private owner tank cars until replaced with a road tanker fleet duirng the 60s-70s. Much of the traffic would have been single tank cars to oil depots at relatively small country stations in similar RCH pattern tank wagons to those used in the UK. Most companies had rail served terminals on Dublin's Alexandra Rd tramway, Irish Shell & BP its own Planet diesel loco.

Many of the wagons appear to have been a 1927 (UK) RCH design, though Caltex invested in a fleet pf 'modern" anchor mounted but unfitted tank wagons in 1960 and ESSO imported vacuum fitted wagons from the UK in the late 60s for its Sligo, Claremorris and a short lived Oranmore traffic flows.

While the companies invested heavily in new high capacity tank wagons for use in Great Britain during the early 1960s, the old wagons soldiered on in Ireland until late 60s/early 70s. Esso used modern but essentially obsolete wagons from the Britain for its traffic to the West. 

Its possible a re-liveried Oxford tank wagon may pass for a 'typical" Irish company wagon.

2Mex08082024.thumb.jpg.eb4f9848affe110c044eaf48f4067214.jpg

Mex (Mc Mullen Bros?) Class A tank (two compartments different grades of petrol or petrol and TVO?)

7IrishShell08082024.thumb.jpg.d8eba8e2e294ea4229bb46aa6a5d73d8.jpg

Another Class A (highly flammable) wagon dumped/stored at East Wall late 1990s

4ESSOl08082024.thumb.jpg.f1473f9098efa6decf8c856b29a61dbe.jpg

ESSO logo just about visible Class B (Diesel, heavy fuel) Black

6ShellMexNI08082024.thumb.jpg.97b539dda899e0dd343c3584e4bbf7ba.jpg

 

Makers photo Shell-Mex Northern Ireland

Many of the old private owner wagons in the South ended up stored/dumped near Sheriff St Signal box North Wall and may have been used for departmental use before scrapping.

At one stage the Alexandra Road-Inchacore fuel train was made up of 1960 Clatex-Texaco tank wagons with Caltex 'grinning: through the Texaco marking.

5Caltex08082024.thumb.jpg.287af476c9387a1ce64bab7f870639f9.jpg

 

 

 

While Oil Company traffic was light and wagons scarce compared with other types, small depots at branchline terminals and large country times were common enough, the old style tank wagons produced by Bachmann and Oxford rail appear 'close enough" and used in conjunction with a small oil depot make an interesting scene and add to the operational interest of a layout.

Sometimes visible in the background of photos the Oil Company depots at country stations were often small in scale one or two storage tanks inside a fenced compound. 

Oil depots were added at both Loughrea and Ballinrobe during the 1930s "Baronial Lines of the MGWR " P O'Cuimin

The depot at Loughrea was sited near the buffers at the end of the cattle bank siding. Ballinrobe between the Station Building and Goods shed behind the platform. Its possible tank wagons were unloaded on the cattle bank road and piped (underground) to the Oil Depot, difficult to imaginge tank wagons with a highly flammable load being unloaded at the platform.

Bantry09082024.thumb.jpg.449d8a1f162443505e260e6a4d766d68.jpg

'A Decade of Steam "RPSI  Excursion train at Bantry 1954 photographer uncredited

mypicturesbackupfile2004173.thumb.jpg.6a1ffedd08d88bd02651e47d39a0c1a9.jpg

Cahirciveen 2002? Irish Shell Depot appears to be on its original rail served site though the tanks may be modern replacements. There is a photo showing a tank wagon on the rail side of the depot in the Cahirciveen-Valencia railway book.

The depot was site at the back of the cattle bank once located on the roadway on the right. The modern building in the background are government offices (Tax?) built in connection with the Governments de-centralisation programme of the eraly 2000s

mypicturesbackupfile2004172.thumb.jpg.2e42b54aab2b0b6e466a5ce63264b7a8.jpg

Another rail related building structure survived into the 21st Century at Cahirciveen, once possibly used as a Guinness store again served by the Cattle Bank siding.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

But the Bantry oil depot seems to only have rail access, the oil was loaded for customer delivery from standpipes between the station buildings and the goods shed.

 

Posted
On 1/8/2024 at 4:39 PM, Johnny B. Good said:

I know the answer is probably “no” (because nothing could be that easy) but were rectangular tank wagons ever used in Ireland in the days of steam? 

image.thumb.jpeg.a9a0c8366660b5b17faa714a2034ef68.jpeg

Seen at Killorglin with the Valentia Line lifting train in June 1961. A David Soggee photo, Copyright IRRS.

71036copy2.jpeg.0c67b8fe950afbce410d205e76c2a67f.jpeg

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, leslie10646 said:

Seen at Killorglin with the Valentia Line lifting train in June 1961. A David Soggee photo, Copyright IRRS.

71036copy2.jpeg.0c67b8fe950afbce410d205e76c2a67f.jpeg

 

Looks like a tank orignially used with an oil burning steam loco during the  1947 -48 'Fuel Crisis" mounted on a flat wagon. CIE converted approx. 60 steam locos to oil burners so plenty of tanks available,  

  • Like 1
Posted
On 9/8/2024 at 12:40 AM, Mayner said:

 

While Oil Company traffic was light and wagons scarce compared with other types, small depots at branchline terminals and large country times were common enough, the old style tank wagons produced by Bachmann and Oxford rail appear 'close enough" and used in conjunction with a small oil depot make an interesting scene and add to the operational interest of a layout.

Sometimes visible in the background of photos the Oil Company depots at country stations were often small in scale one or two storage tanks inside a fenced compound. 

Oil depots were added at both Loughrea and Ballinrobe during the 1930s "Baronial Lines of the MGWR " P O'Cuimin

The depot at Loughrea was sited near the buffers at the end of the cattle bank siding. Ballinrobe between the Station Building and Goods shed behind the platform. Its possible tank wagons were unloaded on the cattle bank road and piped (underground) to the Oil Depot, difficult to imaginge tank wagons with a highly flammable load being unloaded at the platform.

Bantry09082024.thumb.jpg.449d8a1f162443505e260e6a4d766d68.jpg

'A Decade of Steam "RPSI  Excursion train at Bantry 1954 photographer uncredited

mypicturesbackupfile2004173.thumb.jpg.6a1ffedd08d88bd02651e47d39a0c1a9.jpg

Cahirciveen 2002? Irish Shell Depot appears to be on its original rail served site though the tanks may be modern replacements. There is a photo showing a tank wagon on the rail side of the depot in the Cahirciveen-Valencia railway book.

The depot was site at the back of the cattle bank once located on the roadway on the right. The modern building in the background are government offices (Tax?) built in connection with the Governments de-centralisation programme of the eraly 2000s

mypicturesbackupfile2004172.thumb.jpg.2e42b54aab2b0b6e466a5ce63264b7a8.jpg

Another rail related building structure survived into the 21st Century at Cahirciveen, once possibly used as a Guinness store again served by the Cattle Bank siding.

 

 

 

John

The "modern" building in the background is the former RIC Barracks, burnt out by "The Boys" during the original troubles. I'm pleased to see the building restored - it looked like that when I dragged one of my English tour parties to view the bridge over the river - which is also still there - at least what I told them - I wanted to see the station!

  • Like 1
Posted
On 7/8/2024 at 11:09 AM, Galteemore said:

Would love to see some photos of your work HT - sounds really good stuff.

Late news: have finally found my rolling mill, which was hiding in plain sight in the shed. There are some etched boilers that are overdue some rolling....

  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
10 hours ago, leslie10646 said:

John

The "modern" building in the background is the former RIC Barracks, burnt out by "The Boys" during the original troubles. I'm pleased to see the building restored - it looked like that when I dragged one of my English tour parties to view the bridge over the river - which is also still there - at least what I told them - I wanted to see the station!

Leslie

I was referring to the Revenue Commissioners building(data centre) seen in the background of the photo of the oil depot not the old RIC Barracks.

mypicturesbackupfile2004173.thumb.jpg.b3a543ff2c93e9dfaee1c1cc5f26e808.jpg

The building built under a shorth lived Irish Government 'de-centralisation' policy occupied an area once occupied a large part of the station site. I worked for a Government agency at the time (2003) the Head Office function was to be de-centralised at the time, but subsequently cancelled. I worked 'remotely" in Dublin and Leinster but was 'flying' the flag in Kerry when I took the photos, I ended up working for a similar agency when we moved to New Zealand but found they were 10-15 years behind Ireland in the use of IT and remote working.

mypicturesbackupfile2004170.thumb.jpg.5a9d0740f966761ca6d79244f07e4c39.jpg

There were rumours that the Barracks was designed for India's North West Frontier.

mypicturesbackupfile2004171.thumb.jpg.2b687185db57d5b489daa8017f88dde3.jpg

 

 

Edited by Mayner
  • Like 3
Posted
8 hours ago, minister_for_hardship said:

Wonder what that tax office building is doing now? Only asking as I had a hand in the construction of part of that, my then boss was telling me he saw traces of the railway site digging the foundations for it.

Headquartersof the 'Legal Aid Board" https://www.legalaidboard.ie/en/, I was under the impression that it was a Data Centre for the Revenue which is quite de-centralised with different departments dispersed around the country.

I was working for the Health and Safety Authority at the time which was to be 'de-centralised" to Thomastown shortly before the policy was cancelled. The de-centralisation would have probably have affected 15-20 head office staff as the operational staff worked from regional offices or remotely from home, not a great windfall for Thomastown.

  • Thanks 1
  • 9 months later...
Posted
On 25/1/2022 at 1:11 PM, jhb171achill said:

BR Mk. 1 full parcels brake = CIE “BR” genny van 

Plus of course, numerous Mk 2 & Mk 3 carriages….

Would you be able to point me in the right direction to find info on how to convert BR Mk1 = CIE "BR" Genny?

 

I bought 3 Lima ones at a show recently.

 

Would be very grateful if you could help?

Thanks,

Alan

Posted
23 minutes ago, GM073 said:

Would you be able to point me in the right direction to find info on how to convert BR Mk1 = CIE "BR" Genny?

 

I bought 3 Lima ones at a show recently.

 

Would be very grateful if you could help?

Thanks,

Alan

The challenge in converting a BR MK1 Full Brake into a CIE BR Genny Van is that the BR MK1 full brakes were shorter (57') than the Genny Vans (64'6") and the arrangement of doors-windows at the generator end of the CIE vans was quite different to the BR Full Brake.

As far as I recall the CIE "BR Vans" were converted from MK1 Brake end coaches of two different types Brake 2nd & Brake 1st?)

SSM did a brass overlay for a "BR Van" & Bill Bedford (Mousa Models" did overlays for both varieties of "BR Van" which should be suitable for any type of 64' MK1 coach.

Another alternative is to convert a "BR Van" from a MK1 Brake end coach and block up the redundant windows at the generator end with plasticard & fabricate a set of louvers from plasticard to fit in one opening, there is other stuff such as modified roof & underframe detail and fitting B4 Bogies, IRM/Accurascale are apparently planning at some stage to introduce a CIE "BR Van" 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, GM073 said:

Would you be able to point me in the right direction to find info on how to convert BR Mk1 = CIE "BR" Genny?

 

I bought 3 Lima ones at a show recently.

 

Would be very grateful if you could help?

Thanks,

Alan

@Noel converted a Lima Mk 1 into a Generator Van - he talked through the process on his workbench thread

 

Posted
43 minutes ago, Mayner said:

The challenge in converting a BR MK1 Full Brake into a CIE BR Genny Van is that the BR MK1 full brakes were shorter (57') than the Genny Vans (64'6") and the arrangement of doors-windows at the generator end of the CIE vans was quite different to the BR Full Brake.

I seem to recall that Lima's early attempts at a Mk1 BG full brake incorrectly came out at a scale 64' instead of 57'.

You could do worse than acquiring an old Kitmaster Mk1 BSK or CK kit and using that to break down as per @Mayner 's suggestion 

Posted
9 hours ago, Mayner said:

The challenge in converting a BR MK1 Full Brake into a CIE BR Genny Van is that the BR MK1 full brakes were shorter (57') than the Genny Vans (64'6") and the arrangement of doors-windows at the generator end of the CIE vans was quite different to the BR Full Brake.

As far as I recall the CIE "BR Vans" were converted from MK1 Brake end coaches of two different types Brake 2nd & Brake 1st?)

SSM did a brass overlay for a "BR Van" & Bill Bedford (Mousa Models" did overlays for both varieties of "BR Van" which should be suitable for any type of 64' MK1 coach.

Another alternative is to convert a "BR Van" from a MK1 Brake end coach and block up the redundant windows at the generator end with plasticard & fabricate a set of louvers from plasticard to fit in one opening, there is other stuff such as modified roof & underframe detail and fitting B4 Bogies, IRM/Accurascale are apparently planning at some stage to introduce a CIE "BR Van" 

The BR generator vans were converted from BSK and BCK.

Stephen

Posted
46 minutes ago, StevieB said:

The BR generator vans were converted from BSK and BCK.

Stephen

 

  • Informative 1
  • 5 months later...
Posted

I was thinking recently with the developments of 3D printing even in the last 6 months, I might perhaps return to the ideo of Irish loco shells to fit hornby/Bachmann ect. Chassis. I made GSR no.479 years ago and I think I’d like to return to it, but remove the original Adam’s radial and start from scratch with a holy 3D printed shell. 

Pros

- Garunteed decent running

-takes the hassle out of a custom built chassis

-takes the cost out if a custom built chassis (wheels ect are expensive and add up)

-Allows for lower skill entry point for creation 

-Allows for much more niche models to be made

Cons 

-the loco body might have to be manipulated to fit the motor or look right on the running board 

-chassis will never be perfect…wether it be wheeel size, shape, distance, colour… width (lol) 

-Some chassis are also not cheap! 

 

IMG_4092.thumb.jpeg.cd1b57b1d6fe411d0722f661ccb1b180.jpeg

As an experiment. I set myself a challenge to see what I could make in roughly 5 minutes. This crude GSWR J11 is the result of that. But if I had access to an 0-6-0 chassis and the dimensions of said chassis, something like this could be made practical with a couple of hours work. Generally it’s better to work backwards from the chassis to the shell and not the other way around 

there would also have to be a loading gauge established for making stuff like this such as 
rail to centre point of buffer 

Acceptable width (considering 5’3) 

acceptable height (don’t want the cabs towering over coaches) 

and so on 

 

  • Like 7
  • Informative 1
Posted

Thats some excellent work there, Ive been considering a J11 for a 57xx chassis as I believe theyre quite close in terms of wheelbase/diameters, just going to include these drawings in case you hadnt them already

 

Screenshot 2025-06-28 225211.png

Screenshot 2025-06-28 225223.png

Screenshot 2025-06-28 225237.png

Screenshot 2025-06-28 225253.png

  • Like 5
Posted

Given the high cost of new rtr locos, it may be worth looking back at earlier incarnations, where the second hand market will have a decent supply of doners and/or chassis. Current models are both stunning and expensive: they also tend to have very bespoke chassis, not suitable for anything else. Back in the day it was much easier to adapt a chassis to run under something else and old Hornby, Dapol, Lima, etc models could be the starting point.

  • Like 4
Posted
20 minutes ago, David Holman said:

Given the high cost of new rtr locos, it may be worth looking back at earlier incarnations, where the second hand market will have a decent supply of doners and/or chassis. Current models are both stunning and expensive: they also tend to have very bespoke chassis, not suitable for anything else. Back in the day it was much easier to adapt a chassis to run under something else and old Hornby, Dapol, Lima, etc models could be the starting point.

Agreed. The modern desire for DCC, sound and heavy weight has encouraged the manufacturers to fill every available bit of space inside the bodyshell, especially for smaller steam locos. That means that a modern chassis is less likely to fit a different shape body.

However, with older chassis there's something else to watch out for - are they actually accurate to the original prototype? It's all very well finding that your J11 has the same wheelbase and wheel diameter as a GWR 57xx, but does the older model 57xx have the right dimensions? For older models manufacturers used the same chassis for several different prototypes and the dimensions may well be a compromise. Also note - a 57xx is a couple of feet longer than a J11 - can the ends of the chassis be trimmed off without losing anything vital? Will the mechanism still be hidden? At least with a 57xx there are several different models to choose from, including Hornby, Mainline, Bachmann and Accurascale.

17 hours ago, Westcorkrailway said:

there would also have to be a loading gauge established for making stuff like this such as 
rail to centre point of buffer 

Acceptable width (considering 5’3) 

acceptable height (don’t want the cabs towering over coaches) 

My gut feel is that it's best to stick to the true prototype dimensions as much as possible. Once you start changing the proportions of the loco then it soon looks wrong. But this is an area where every individual modeller has their own level of 'good enough'. 

  • Like 3
Posted
37 minutes ago, Mol_PMB said:

 Westcorkrailway said:

there would also have to be a loading gauge established for making stuff like this such as 
rail to centre point of buffer 

Acceptable width (considering 5’3) 

acceptable height (don’t want the cabs towering over coaches) 

Intuitively, I'd agree* with @Mol_PMB on sticking to true prototype dimensions as much as possible, so I'd go with width and height as per prototype. However, for the buffers, if converting OO models for use on an OO layout I'd be inclined to stick with the original buffer dimensions if I had any intentions of running alongside RTR stock - the IRM and Murphy Models stock have standard OO buffer dimensions for instance (I know @Mol_PMB has altered buffers on RTR wagons to get true prototype fidelity, so I'd be interested in his thoughts on this)

 

* my opinion carries the caveat that I've never done anything like this, so it should be taken with a large pinch of salt

18 hours ago, Westcorkrailway said:

As an experiment. I set myself a challenge to see what I could make in roughly 5 minutes. This crude GSWR J11 is the result of that

It looks impressive, especially as this is something you knocked out in a short while 👍

Posted
2 minutes ago, Flying Snail said:

Intuitively, I'd agree* with @Mol_PMB on sticking to true prototype dimensions as much as possible, so I'd go with width and height as per prototype. However, for the buffers, if converting OO models for use on an OO layout I'd be inclined to stick with the original buffer dimensions if I had any intentions of running alongside RTR stock - the IRM and Murphy Models stock have standard OO buffer dimensions for instance (I know @Mol_PMB has altered buffers on RTR wagons to get true prototype fidelity, so I'd be interested in his thoughts on this)

 

* my opinion carries the caveat that I've never done anything like this, so it should be taken with a large pinch of salt

IRM and Murphy have both produced models with the correct Irish buffer spacing, equally they have both produced other models with GB narrower buffer spacing. It depends which model you pick!

3D printed buffers are often fragile, and easily broken. Ideally I wouldn't want the buffers included on the main body print at all - I would prefer to fit separate buffers (usually cast metal). Let the modeller drill the holes for them at their preferred spacing. You could probably include a couple of small 'dimples' at each spacing to help start the drill in the right place - the other dimple would end up hidden behind the buffer housing.

  • Informative 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Mol_PMB said:

IRM and Murphy have both produced models with the correct Irish buffer spacing, equally they have both produced other models with GB narrower buffer spacing. It depends which model you pick!

3D printed buffers are often fragile, and easily broken. Ideally I wouldn't want the buffers included on the main body print at all - I would prefer to fit separate buffers (usually cast metal). Let the modeller drill the holes for them at their preferred spacing. You could probably include a couple of small 'dimples' at each spacing to help start the drill in the right place - the other dimple would end up hidden behind the buffer housing.

Yes. It’s something not yet utilised yet, but things like vac pips and buffers can be purchased in. The other thing mr 3d printer does not like is handrails. Which are a much more eccumenical matter as making those from scratch is a good bit more difficult 

 

although Infairness. Marks Dunleas prints does an ok job with both printed IMG_3658.thumb.jpeg.a8445a27533158e99ab648c3651cc473.jpeg

 

IMG_3659.thumb.jpeg.7e3f29f2d2d4c667e0df16bbc2a4107f.jpeg
 

At the end of the day, if your looking for a GB chassis your already making accepting your going to have to make compromises. However stuff like the GSWR J11, i wouldn’t think there would need to be too much given how much space there would be for motor within it. A J26 for example, would be much harder, Infact I don’t think you could ever make one that looks right unless it was the SSM kit or a RTR model 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

The 'difficult' bits with handrails are drilling the holes in the right place, and forming the wire to the right shape. That can be helped by:

  • Put dimples in the 3D print to guide where the holes need to be. 
  • Provide a separate (also 3D printed) part which is a bending jig for complex shaped handrails. Then you can get the shape right before fitting it to the model.

 

  • Agree 2
Posted (edited)
43 minutes ago, Mol_PMB said:

The 'difficult' bits with handrails are drilling the holes in the right place, and forming the wire to the right shape. That can be helped by:

  • Put dimples in the 3D print to guide where the holes need to be. 
  • Provide a separate (also 3D printed) part which is a bending jig for complex shaped handrails. Then you can get the shape right before fitting it to the model.

 

You can straight-up print the model with holes AFAIK, avoiding the need to drill (somewhat brittle) 3d prints altogether. Might need to bore some out somewhat at worst.

I think this is preferable, better to have a more durable brass or N/S wire for handrails IMO.

The addition of a jig would further simplify it further, yes.

Edited by GSR 800
  • Like 1
  • Agree 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use