Railer Posted February 8, 2016 Posted February 8, 2016 Still reckon theres no need for 206/207/208/209/227/228/231 & 233 to be all fitted with the new gear. I do, 3 locos needed daily. Then they all need their weekly exam, monthly, 6 month exam and so on. Then you have to allow for maintenance failures, locos off for bogie changes. They were all due a major overhaul anyway as all the 201s are suffering from big rust problems. The quick patch job on 232 is clear proof of that. Quote
Garfield Posted February 19, 2016 Posted February 19, 2016 Just saw some photos posted by Belmond on their Facebook page... In the caption they claim to have bought the locomotive: "Belmond purchased the 10 carriages and locomotive from Irish Rail earlier this year and began transformation of the mark 3 carriages into Ireland’s first luxury sleeper train." Quote
Noel Posted February 19, 2016 Posted February 19, 2016 Just saw some photos posted by Belmond on their Facebook page... In the caption they claim to have bought the locomotive: "Belmond purchased the 10 carriages and locomotive from Irish Rail earlier this year and began transformation of the mark 3 carriages into Ireland’s first luxury sleeper train." Question, were the mk3 corridor connectors magnetic or were they fastened together? Quote
Dhu Varren Posted February 19, 2016 Posted February 19, 2016 Question, were the mk3 corridor connectors magnetic or were they fastened together? The answer is neither. Known as Pullman Gangways, they are used in conjunction with buckeye couplers and held together by spring pressure. Quote:- Pullman gangways are associated with the buckeye automatic coupling. Prior to Nationalisation the coupling was widely adopted by the Southern (Maunsell and Bulleid) and the LNER ( Gresley and Thompson) as well as being used on Pullman cars. The LNER are probably unique in UK steam in that Pullman gangways were used on coridor tenders. Post Nationalisation Pullman gangways were used on MK1, and later, loco hauled coaching stock plus a number of EMUs. Coach side buffers play no part in Pullman to Pullman conections with the bellows part being kept together with springs at the bottom of the gangway. There are no clips or other fittings holding the gangways together, simply spring pressure. Quote
brianmcs Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 http://www.irishmirror.ie/lifestyle/travel/pictured-take-sneak-peek-inside-7443339 Quote
craven1508 Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 more then likely going to be priced well out of reach of the ordinary punter? but it will be nice!! Quote
skinner75 Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 more then likely going to be priced well out of reach of the ordinary punter? but it will be nice!! Prices start at £2,338 per person for the 2 day trip Quote
Railer Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 They keep posting up those internal pictures, they are just concept shots. The observation coach ending up looking different than the concept shots externally already. Quote
Noel Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 more then likely going to be priced well out of reach of the ordinary punter? but it will be nice!! It is priced for a well established luxury market segment. Similar pricing to the top end Orient express services. £6,340.00pps for 5 night Orient Express v £5,714.28pps for 6 night Hibernian trip. It may be small but there is a market for such premium experiences. Quote
jhb171achill Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 By comparison, the Railtours Ireland "Emerald Isle Express" is €4000 for six days, and uses decent hotels. Quote
Noel Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 By comparison, the Railtours Ireland "Emerald Isle Express" is €4000 for six days, and uses decent hotels. EIE is almost half the price and offering quite a different experience. The BH is a much more luxurious offering, but quite different in that is like a cruise ship experience where the train is home for a few days (i.e. sleep onboard, unpack only once but visit many places). EIE involves the hassle of transfers every day to hotels with packing and unpacking. One of the reasons cruise ship holidays has become so popular is the convenience of "unpack once". BH is all about the train experience. Personally I'd prefer the EIE type of offering as you get to experience nice hotels. Not sure if the BH plan is to travel at night arriving at new destination by morning, but the distances are very short so can't see them needing more than 3hr for typical route legs unlike a cruise ship that usually take on 10hr passage legs overnight. Quote
DiveController Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 It would seem to make sense that they might travel early morning or late afternoon depending on location and seasonal lighting conditions so that the passengers might enjoy the countryside and views over dinner or breakfast, at dawn or about dusk as appropriate. This would maximize time out and about during the day or facilitate an evening excursion for dinner while avoiding some rock 'n' roll during your morning shower. Quote
jhb171achill Posted February 26, 2016 Posted February 26, 2016 Yes, the EIE is different in several fundamental respects, though I suppose it's the nearest thing comparable in Ireland. It may interest readers to know that a good 25 years ago the RPSI did a feasibility study aimed at establishing the viability of a thing like this using preserved RPSI (wooden) carriages. At the time the society would never have even remotely been able to fund this sort of thing; this was before European and "Peace" money was available. The idea was well ahead of its time. It was planned to focus primarily on the Connolly - Rosslare - Limerick route. No. 4 was the preferred locomotive, and carriages would have been hand picked and restored to a very high standard. Quote
heustonconnolly Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Anyone know where the belmond mk3 rake will be stored when out of service? Inchicore? York Road? Whitehead? Connolly V.P/sidings? Heuston/V.P could be opened to store the set? Quote
jhb171achill Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 I'd say it would have to be Inchicore.... Quote
heustonconnolly Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 I was thinking inchicore too, then I saw somewhere that its going to be stored somewhere in northern Ireland think it was whitehead, and I didn't think they stored "in service" stock at whitehead ever? Will the set ever operate out of Connolly, or just heuston? Quote
jhb171achill Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 It's highly unlikely to be Whitehead, as there's no room. Wherever it is, it would need to be indoors and we'll look after. If they were to move the 3000 sets to Adelaide, they might put it in fortwilliam tin shed. I don't see any possibility whatever for it to be stabled in the north anywhere else. Quote
heustonconnolly Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 I was thinking inchicore too, then I saw somewhere that its going to be stored somewhere in northern Ireland think it was whitehead, and I didn't think they stored "in service" stock at whitehead ever? Will the set ever operate out of Connolly, or just heuston? Quote
heustonconnolly Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Sorry posted that twice :confused: Will the sets work out of Connolly or just heuston? Quote
GSR 800 Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Sorry posted that twice :confused:Will the sets work out of Connolly or just heuston? Both Quote
Lough Erne Posted February 27, 2016 Posted February 27, 2016 Without a shadow of a doubt, they will not be stored at whitehead! From what I've heard it will be a Dublin based location - however either BBC/ some local rag reported the sale of the BallyKelly MOD site and the buyer has stated that they may build a 'rail carriage facility' on site. This is perhaps where the Northern aspect comes in. It may well be the Mivan group perhaps looking to act as some form of rail care sub-contractor - after all they are doing the internal refurb of the mk3s. Pure speculation of course. Quote
hurricanemk1c Posted February 28, 2016 Posted February 28, 2016 Heard Heuston VP as the servicing base (running service, A+B exam style stuff). Heavy stiff would have to be Inchicore Quote
Warbonnet Posted February 28, 2016 Posted February 28, 2016 Heard Heuston VP as the servicing base (running service' date=' A+B exam style stuff). Heavy stiff would have to be Inchicore[/quote'] This is what I heard too. Quote
jhb171achill Posted February 28, 2016 Posted February 28, 2016 Heard Heuston VP as the servicing base (running service, A+B exam style stuff). Heavy stiff would have to be Inchicore That would make perfect sense. Quote
airfixfan Posted February 29, 2016 Posted February 29, 2016 Feature on BBC NI news last Thursday showed some of the Belmond coaches being done up by MIVAN near Antrim. On the Ballykelly story the new site owners told one of the local press that they planned to reopen the Ballykelly base as an airport. Maybe they think that the Derry line is closed or they have a rail problem! Quote
jhb171achill Posted March 5, 2016 Posted March 5, 2016 Belmond are going to use the train to fly people to JFK in the off season... Quote
GSR 800 Posted March 13, 2016 Posted March 13, 2016 Are Belmond using two locos? What's the other one? Quote
hurricanemk1c Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 Currently only one loco (spare would be the standby loco at Heuston/Cork/Connolly/Belfast). Rumours going around that it is late, not got RSC approval and won't operate to Northern Ireland this year. Although 216 is fitted with at least the mounting for the Enterprise DMI Quote
Railer Posted July 9, 2016 Posted July 9, 2016 Currently only one loco (spare would be the standby loco at Heuston/Cork/Connolly/Belfast). Rumours going around that it is late, not got RSC approval and won't operate to Northern Ireland this year. Although 216 is fitted with at least the mounting for the Enterprise DMI What I have read is that it can go as far as Belfast but not on the Portrush line. The station is 50 metres too short for the Belmond set and it has no grandfather rights on the NIR network as Mk3s never ran a regular timetabled service on the NIR network. Quote
201bhoy Posted July 10, 2016 Posted July 10, 2016 What I have read is that it can go as far as Belfast but not on the Portrush line. The station is 50 metres too short for the Belmond set and it has no grandfather rights on the NIR network as Mk3s never ran a regular timetabled service on the NIR network. I thought it would be running as far as Coleraine where the passengers would be transferred to a CAF set? Quote
hurricanemk1c Posted July 10, 2016 Posted July 10, 2016 I thought it would be running as far as Coleraine where the passengers would be transferred to a CAF set? Last I heard it was luxury coach from Coleraine to the Giant's Causeway and Bushmills. Of little interest until they are approved for NIR running Quote
MOGUL Posted July 22, 2016 Posted July 22, 2016 Battleship Gray 071 just passed Glasnevin with coach Donegal on transfer to Inchicore.. Does anyone know how many coaches have been delivered now? Quote
ttc0169 Posted July 22, 2016 Posted July 22, 2016 Battleship Gray 071 just passed Glasnevin with coach Donegal on transfer to Inchicore.. Does anyone know how many coaches have been delivered now? That's the sixth coach so....four more left to come. Quote
jhb171achill Posted July 23, 2016 Posted July 23, 2016 Is the one named "Donegal" 3ft gauge, I wonder? ...... Quote
NIRCLASS80 Posted July 23, 2016 Posted July 23, 2016 The Belmond Hibernian will not be travelling north of Belfast for this year anyway. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.