Jump to content

What happened to 224

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Posted

Anyone know what has happened to 224? No one is saying but if all the rumor and reading between the lines she now part of the orange 201 line up in Inchicore.

  • Like 1
Posted

With IE staff appealing to enthusiasts for photos of the loco taken in recent times, I'm guessing they'd like to know what happened to her, too! She does look quite bent.

Posted (edited)

Did a similar fate not befall CIE (B201) 224 , following its transfer to NIR in 1985/86 was found to have a bent frame and was replaced by 218 , its was laying out of use for many years before being scrapped . 

Edited by flange lubricator
  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, flange lubricator said:

Did a similar fate not befall CIE (B201) 224 , following its transfer to NIR in 1985/86 was found to have a bent frame and was replaced by 218 , its was laying out of use for many years before being scrapped . 

It happened 143 too. It ended up being confined to 40mph max and only shunted in Northwall Yard or Inchicore. It was painted on the cab sides similar to the air brake note painted on the 121s.

Posted
3 hours ago, Railer said:

Yeah, looks to be a hit and run. Maybe the loss of 224 will see it harvested enabling the return of 230 to the fleet.

Wouldn't say it's a hit and run - both ends look undamaged. You'd expect buffers to fail and some crumpling there before the main frame would give way.

  • Like 1
Posted

There is one up on social media dated the 2nd of July of it parked up in Inchicore. No clear signs of damage, only thing to me is that the body panel behind the No1 end cab is a bit warped. 

Posted

A friend of mine (irishtrains on instagram, for photo credit) sent me this shot last night, taken the day of the incident. Could be just me but it seems it's got a decent bend in the middle?

image0.jpg

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

Looks very similar to how 124 and 134 looked before they were withdrawn. I always thought they had bent frames but clearly not as they were used on everything right up to the end.

Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, Warbonnet said:

It’ll buff out (on Facebook) 

E7AB8CFE-F330-492F-A0A0-20D4AC3BABFF.thumb.jpeg.c8f0de1282691ba115bd566d9b00eea7.jpeg

Bloody potholes! :)  
 

either that or somebody made a sows ear of putting the decoder in.

Edited by Noel
  • Like 1
Posted

So there was an accident or someone noticed it just had a wrap frame one day? 

And 224 did have a bent frame presumably due to fatigue but iirc wasn't 143 the result of an accident and thereafter it was speed restricted. Shows that there was a need for 141s at that time but not much traffic for so many 201s now  

Posted

the Isle of Man used to have a load of carrigaes which had that fault and they keep on using them. That said it is a concern that a relative new loco has deveolped such a problem bring back the Heitage collection of ex CIE diesle locos.

Could be that Inchicore are in for a lot of rebuilding with new chassis's or a building a new jig to put each one right as they go through a full service, out of interest how many do they need to run the current service and just how many do they have in total?

Colin R

Posted
On 7/22/2020 at 12:36 AM, Ironroad said:

But is it an inherent problem, or is it due to impact that wasn't reported? Seems very strange. 

Apparently it was a metal fatigue defect that was known about from previous exams but the problem accelerated far quicker than expected to the point of failure. I don't know how true that is but it's one of the stories going around. 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, DJ Dangerous said:

So, is this the end of 224?

If so, will 224 be used for parts to revive one of the hulks sitting outside Inchicore?

Will we then see an "071 grey" liveried 201 in service?

 

Most definitely the end for 224. No doubt useable components will be salvaged and could possibly be used in other locos - either replacing parts on locos still in service where required, or possibly to aid in the rebuilding of 230.

I wouldn't expect to see grey 201s. :) 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 hour ago, Garfield said:

Most definitely the end for 224. No doubt useable components will be salvaged and could possibly be used in other locos - either replacing parts on locos still in service where required, or possibly to aid in the rebuilding of 230.

I wouldn't expect to see grey 201s. :) 

Hey, I thought that you were a ghost?

How about an orange and black 230 with CIE roundels?

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Garfield said:

Most definitely the end for 224. No doubt useable components will be salvaged and could possibly be used in other locos - either replacing parts on locos still in service where required, or possibly to aid in the rebuilding of 230.

I wouldn't expect to see grey 201s. :) 

Be nice to see the parts put into 201 and get her reinstated as a heritage livery

Edited by mphoey
missed letters
Posted
2 minutes ago, mphoey said:

Be nice to see the parts put into 201 and get her reinstated as a heritage livery

It would, but as 230 would require less work it's the only one I can see benefiting from such a transplant of parts.

  • Like 1
Posted

Any chance of a special edition 224 model at some point?

Would there be space to fit an additional servo-controlled catch inside, that could be operated via DCC, and induce the 'drop' at the whim of the controller?

  • Like 1
  • Funny 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Railer said:

Apparently it was a metal fatigue defect that was known about from previous exams but the problem accelerated far quicker than expected to the point of failure. I don't know how true that is but it's one of the stories going around. 

If that is true is seems to me the whole class is doomed. Not a great recommendation of a GM product and certainly not to be expected in a locomotive that is a mere 25 years old.

Posted
32 minutes ago, Ironroad said:

If that is true is seems to me the whole class is doomed. Not a great recommendation of a GM product and certainly not to be expected in a locomotive that is a mere 25 years old.

hopefully just her affected as none of the rest seem to be showing signs

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
Posted

From the latest edition of The Irish Mail (ITG), it looks like the engine from 224 may be used in 223, and various other bits used in 230 to get both back in service. 

Please correct me if I have the two mixed up!

  • Like 1
  • 8 months later...
Posted

According to the railway safety inspectors report the crack was caused by poor weld repairs during maintenance in either 2010 or 2019, IE has now introduced weld repair books to record the location and detail of every new weld as well as adopting the international recognised standard for weld repairs 

  • Like 1
  • Informative 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use